2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential application of high pressure carbon dioxide in treated wastewater and water disinfection: Recent overview and further trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the dry E. coli was placed in the same conditions, cell colonies were reduced by < 0.5 log (CFU/mL). Other researchers have also demonstrated that water content plays an essential role in the bactericidal effect of HPCD [ 59 ]. Generally, HPCD technology presents a better inactivation efficiency for liquid materials compared to solids.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Inactivation Effect Of Hpcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the dry E. coli was placed in the same conditions, cell colonies were reduced by < 0.5 log (CFU/mL). Other researchers have also demonstrated that water content plays an essential role in the bactericidal effect of HPCD [ 59 ]. Generally, HPCD technology presents a better inactivation efficiency for liquid materials compared to solids.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Inactivation Effect Of Hpcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a long time, enormous contributions have been made to virus inactivation by many conventional disinfection techniques. For instance, physical techniques consist of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, heating, reverse osmosis, filtration and high pressure [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Chemical techniques consist of ozone oxidation, chlorination, acid, alkali and oxidant methods [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, pressurized CO 2 has shown great potential as a sustainable disinfection technology in water and wastewater treatment applications [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] largely because this method does not generate DBPs [9,22]. Kobayashi et al [16,17] employed CO 2 microbubbles in the treatment of drinking water and succeeded in inhibiting Escherichia coli within 13.3 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%