2014
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of direct and indirect estimates of apparent total tract digestibility in swine with effort to reduce variation by pooling of multiple day fecal samples

Abstract: The intent of this study was to establish a fecal sampling procedure for the indicator method (IM) to provide digestibility values similar to those obtained by the total collection (TC) method. A total of 24 pigs (52.6 ± 1.5 kg) were fed 1 of 4 diets with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of virginiamycin and phytase (PHY) added to a corn-soybean meal diet with no inorganic P supplement. Pigs were housed in metabolism crates for a 5-d TC period after 7 d of adaptation. Immediately after the TC, a fecal collection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each collection phase, a preservative of 50 mL of 6 N HCl was added to collection buckets placed under the metabolism crates. Feces and urine were collected and weighed, and all the feces and a 20% subsample of the urine were stored at −20 • C. Feces and urine from 3 different collection periods were kept separated and labeled accordingly; similar portions of feces and urine from the different collection periods were then composited into 3 additional samples (from days 8 to 11, days 8 to 13, and days 8 to 15) and labeled accordingly [32,33]. During the collection period, feed refusals and spillage were collected daily and subsequently dried and weighed [34].…”
Section: Diets and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each collection phase, a preservative of 50 mL of 6 N HCl was added to collection buckets placed under the metabolism crates. Feces and urine were collected and weighed, and all the feces and a 20% subsample of the urine were stored at −20 • C. Feces and urine from 3 different collection periods were kept separated and labeled accordingly; similar portions of feces and urine from the different collection periods were then composited into 3 additional samples (from days 8 to 11, days 8 to 13, and days 8 to 15) and labeled accordingly [32,33]. During the collection period, feed refusals and spillage were collected daily and subsequently dried and weighed [34].…”
Section: Diets and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also based on the macronutrients digestibility, only 5-day sample pooling reached their plateaus and was similar with the value observed by TM. However, in the study of Jang et al. (2014) , no consistently improved variation of digestibility was observed by the pooling of feces from 2 to 5-days.…”
Section: Total Collection and Index Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Previous data showed that the low feed intake could significantly influence AA digestibility ( Moter and Stein, 2004 ). Meanwhile, the feeding level can be slightly reduced to avoid the feed refusal which leads to additional work in refused feed collection and weighing, as well as the potential further chemical analysis of the refused feed ( Agudelo et al., 2010 , Jang et al., 2014 ).…”
Section: Total Collection and Index Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations