2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different hip prosthesis shapes considering micro-level bone remodeling and stress-shielding criteria using three-dimensional design space topology optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a future study, detailed simulations of implant stability [74][75][76][77] and bone remodeling process [60,[77][78][79][80] can be performed to assess both the short and long term performance of the implant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a future study, detailed simulations of implant stability [74][75][76][77] and bone remodeling process [60,[77][78][79][80] can be performed to assess both the short and long term performance of the implant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible mechanisms of bone loss after large joint replacement surgeries can be summarized as 1) a foreign body reaction of the implant with bone; 2) wear debris effect of the artificial prosthesis; 3) micromotion or micromovement effects at the bone-prosthesis interfaces; and 4) stress shielding effects. 2,5,8,9 The mechanical causes of bone loss were the micromovement effects and stress shielding effects of the implants. The micromotion of the artificial joint into the bone may continuously induce mechanical damage to the bone around the prosthesis and subsequently bone loss occurs around the prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More representative computational predictions may be achieved with mechanistic or multiscaled topographic optimization based models, in which there are on-going research efforts [52][53][54][55]. This study employed a cemented THR as its case study to limit the effects of mechanobiological processes that will compete with remodeling, such as bone ingrowth and damage healing, and demonstrates the continuing value of this simpler approach.…”
Section: Journai Of Biomechanical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 98%