2021
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-1761-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different droplet measurement techniques in the Braunschweig Icing Wind Tunnel

Abstract: Abstract. The generation, transport and characterization of supercooled droplets in multiphase wind tunnel test facilities is of great importance for conducting icing experiments and to better understand cloud microphysical processes such as coalescence, ice nucleation, accretion and riming. To this end, a spray system has been developed, tested and calibrated in the Braunschweig Icing Wind Tunnel. Liquid droplets in the size range of 1 to 150 µm produced by pneumatic atomizers were accelerated to velocities b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the following instruments were used: condensation particle counter (CPC; TSI model 3772) for number concentration of particles with diameter > 10 nm; scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; TSI model 3081) for aerosol size distribution data between 3.2 and 89.1 nm; laser aerosol spectrometer (LAS; TSI model 3340) for aerosol size distribution data between diameters of 0.09 and 5 μm; two-dimensional optical array imaging probe (2DS; SPEC Inc.) ( Lawson et al, 2006 ) for rain water content (RWC) quantified by integrating raindrop size distributions between diameters of 39.9 and 1464.9 μm; and fast cloud droplet probe (FCDP; SPEC Inc.) ( Knop et al, 2021 ) for cloud liquid water content (LWC) calculated by integrating drop size distributions between diameters of 3 and 50 μm. With the exception of SMPS data (45 s resolution), all airborne data were at 1 s resolution.…”
Section: Reanalysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the following instruments were used: condensation particle counter (CPC; TSI model 3772) for number concentration of particles with diameter > 10 nm; scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; TSI model 3081) for aerosol size distribution data between 3.2 and 89.1 nm; laser aerosol spectrometer (LAS; TSI model 3340) for aerosol size distribution data between diameters of 0.09 and 5 μm; two-dimensional optical array imaging probe (2DS; SPEC Inc.) ( Lawson et al, 2006 ) for rain water content (RWC) quantified by integrating raindrop size distributions between diameters of 39.9 and 1464.9 μm; and fast cloud droplet probe (FCDP; SPEC Inc.) ( Knop et al, 2021 ) for cloud liquid water content (LWC) calculated by integrating drop size distributions between diameters of 3 and 50 μm. With the exception of SMPS data (45 s resolution), all airborne data were at 1 s resolution.…”
Section: Reanalysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent work by Knop et al . (2021) which involved an intercomparison between the PDI and laser spectroscopy with a fast cloud droplet probe (FCDP) found good agreement in the mean droplet diameter between FCDP and PDI (for the size range of 8 to 35 μm) with up to 14% deviation. This deviation is well within the range of other instrument intercomparisons (Braga et al ., 2017; Faber et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fast Cloud Droplet Probe (FCDP) (O'Connor et al, 2008;Knop et al, 2021) manufactured by Stratton Park Engineering Company Incorporated (SPEC Inc.) is a forward-scattering probe, which counts single particles in the diameter size range of 1.5 − 50 µm. In this analysis we use only particles with diameters larger than 3µm.…”
Section: Cloud Measurements: the Fast Cloud Droplet Probementioning
confidence: 99%