2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different DNA binding fluorescent dyes for applications of high-resolution melting analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to DD, which showed inhibition at concentrations >1.5. In the same study, EG showed no inhibition of qPCR at concentrations >2, with DNA amounts ranging 25100 ng (12), indicating EG has less of an inhibitory effect on qPCR when compared with DD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to DD, which showed inhibition at concentrations >1.5. In the same study, EG showed no inhibition of qPCR at concentrations >2, with DNA amounts ranging 25100 ng (12), indicating EG has less of an inhibitory effect on qPCR when compared with DD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A previous study (12) showed that at lower DNA quantities (25 ng), SG can inhibit the reaction when concentrations are >0.5. This is in contrast to DD, which showed inhibition at concentrations >1.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High levels of DNA saturation is important for melt curve applications, especially high resolution melting analysis (HRM), where small differences in the amplicon melt pattern are used to infer genotypes [15]. Interestingly, RL and EG, the two dyes that showed the greatest losses in FI and substantial changes of Tm in presence of HA, are commonly used and recommended for HRM [16], [17]. The blend of SY/SG and SY alone on the other hand, gave the smallest differences in Tm when HA was added.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRM was selected since it represents a method that is increasingly popular and widespread due to its accuracy, easy, fast, and cost effective application. It has recently been also successfully adopted in a series of research applications that include single base change genotyping, insertion and deletion genotyping sequence matching, methylation profiling, internal tandem duplication detection, and mutation screening (Radvanszky et al, 2015), while it is in its infancy for the detection of mutations associated with the resistance of fungal plant pathogens to fungicides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%