1990
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740530405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different digesta collection methods to determine the apparent digestibilities of the nutrients at the terminal ileum in pigs

Abstract: Three diflerent cannulation techniques in pigs were tested with 15 crossbred castrates. Four pigs were fitted with a simple T-cannula, six pigs with a postvalve T-caecum cannula ( P V T C cannula) and five pigs with ileocaecal reentrant cannulas. Four diets were tested: a conventional diet, a pectin-rich diet, a crude fibre-rich diet and a semisynthetic diet. For quantitative collection of ileal digesta the PVTC cannulation technique was tested for homogeneity of sampling. Cr,O, and TiO, were used as solid pha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
19
2
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This did not occur, however, with an average marker recovery of only 72%. These recoveries, however, do fall within the range of those reported by den Hartog et al 14 14,16 in PVTCcannulated pigs. It is assumed that in the present study the remaining 28% of the digesta bypassed the cannula and entered the large intestine.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…This did not occur, however, with an average marker recovery of only 72%. These recoveries, however, do fall within the range of those reported by den Hartog et al 14 14,16 in PVTCcannulated pigs. It is assumed that in the present study the remaining 28% of the digesta bypassed the cannula and entered the large intestine.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…In vivo, ileal disappearance methods have, in the absence of better alternatives, been adopted as the method of reference in humans and pigs. Despite the undisputed value of such data, it suffers from a number of limitations, including the potential influence of the absence of colon function, the dependency on marker methodology to correct for incomplete sampling of digesta (18,45), and the contribution of small intestinal fermentation, which can be substantial for some fermentable carbohydrates (46). The approach taken in the current study, based on a difference in natural 13 C enrichment of the starch-compared to nonstarch components of a diet, is simple and noninvasive and can be used to reach a high experimental power, as evidenced by the low variability (SEM) of RS intake (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements using ileostomized patients or ileally cannulated pigs (13)(14)(15)17) are the preferred methods for estimation of RS intake, but these methods ignore the contribution of starch fermentation before the terminal ileum. Furthermore, the use of indigestible markers in ileally cannulated pigs is an important source of error (12,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More likely, collection of ileal digesta through the T-cannulas may have resulted in selective recovery of specific digesta fractions (see e.g. Köhler et al[52]). Although not quantitatively analyzed, the ratio between chromium and cobalt (Cr:Co) in ileal digesta samples collected after pigs received a pulse-dose of Cr 2 O 3 and Co-EDTA, provides some insight in the individual recoveries of solid and soluble digesta fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%