2006
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i36.5893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different diagnostic methods in infants with Cholestasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
48
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
48
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the gold standard of diagnosis is exploratory laparotomy. 2,11,21 Despite their help in differentiating intrahepatic from No statistically significant differences were found in serum levels of AST, ALT and AP, similar to results obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the gold standard of diagnosis is exploratory laparotomy. 2,11,21 Despite their help in differentiating intrahepatic from No statistically significant differences were found in serum levels of AST, ALT and AP, similar to results obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1 Liver biochemical tests show nonspecific and variable elevation in neonatal cholestasis; but both our study, and studies reported by Mieli-Vergani et al, and Dehghani et al revealed that relatively lower AST and higher GGT levels were seen in infants with BA. 8,13 We also detected in infants with BA, serum protein levels were high from infants with NH, which might be explained by infants with NH had more metabolic or infectious diseases that caused malnutrition. In patients with NH, 35% of the patients weight, and 25% of the patients height were below 3 rd percentile.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In our study, the presence of acholic stool and early onset jaundice were key features suggestive of BA, while parental consanguinity and splenomegaly were suggestive of non-BA cholestasis. In the literature, acholic stool was present in 83%-94.7% of patients with BA compared with 45.7%-56.5% of patients with non-BA cholestasis (12)(13)(14). The specificity and sensitivity of acholic stool in cases of BA have also been reported at 74%-86% and 83%-100%, respectively (11,15,16 The mean time to presentation at our clinic was 2 months, most being spent outside hospital, which contrasts with reported presentations between 62 and 112 days in the literature (11)(12)(13)17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%