2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/radarconf2147009.2021.9454980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Approaches for Identification of Radar Ghost Detections in Automotive Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more general work is e.g. [15]. The authors compare a random forest, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and PointNet++ for the detection of arbitrary clutter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general work is e.g. [15]. The authors compare a random forest, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and PointNet++ for the detection of arbitrary clutter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such artifacts within the radar image, which can also be caused by multipath or interference, are a relevant safety issue in autonomous driving. Therefore, on the one hand, the identification and reduction of these ghost targets is subject of current research [32], [33]. On the other hand, there is a need to detect occurring errors in the calibration, which can be caused by aging, temperature change, and deformation, to initiate re-calibration of the sensor [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ghost targets caused by multi-path or clutter are also a common source of false object detection in the automotive domain. Current machine learning approaches are normally based on annotated detection point clouds, as shown in [14], [15], and [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%