The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/itsc48978.2021.9564776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Rule-Based Clutter Detection in Automotive Radar Data

Abstract: The unique properties of radar sensors, such as their robustness to adverse weather conditions, make them an important part of the environment perception system of autonomous vehicles. One of the first steps during the processing of radar point clouds is often the detection of clutter, i.e. erroneous points that do not correspond to real objects. Another common objective is the semantic segmentation of moving road users. These two problems are handled strictly separate from each other in literature. The employ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lidars capture limited points from the side surfaces of these vehicles when they are directly ahead. By contrast, radars yield dense uniform returns from these agents, owing to their large metallic bodies and underbody reflections [68], as discussed in Section VIII. Nevertheless, the associator in a late fusion system may routinely disregard shape features from radar model outputs due to the absence of in-context learning.…”
Section: A Detection-based Tracking 1) Late Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lidars capture limited points from the side surfaces of these vehicles when they are directly ahead. By contrast, radars yield dense uniform returns from these agents, owing to their large metallic bodies and underbody reflections [68], as discussed in Section VIII. Nevertheless, the associator in a late fusion system may routinely disregard shape features from radar model outputs due to the absence of in-context learning.…”
Section: A Detection-based Tracking 1) Late Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multipath effects for autonomous vehicles can be classified into three types: double bounce, underbody reflection, and mirrored ghost detections [68]. Radar double bounces occur due to two back-and-forth reflections between an object and the radar-equipped ego vehicle, resulting in false radar observations at double the range and velocity relative to the real object.…”
Section: Radar: Challenges and Opportunities A Multipath And Cluttermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, since ghost detection has similar dynamics to the real target, it is difficult to eliminate them in the traditional detection pipeline. The multi-path effect can be classified into three types [196]. The first type is the reflection between ego-vehicle and targets.…”
Section: Ghost Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike clutter, ghost objects cannot be filtered by temporal tracking because they have the same kinematic properties as real targets. Instead, they can be detected by geometric methods [196,198]. With a radar ghost dataset, it is also possible to train a neural network for ghost detection, such as PointNet-based methods [89] and PointNet++-based methods [197,199].…”
Section: Ghost Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, automotive radars always operate in the presence of elevation multipath [24], [27][28][29]. Elevation multipath may also occur in tunnels, below bridges, or over-path road signs and constructions [30]. Horizontal multipath occurs when driving near guardrails, buildings, and adjacent vehicles [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%