2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016000161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different anthropometric measures in the adult population in Serbia as indicators of obesity: data from the National Health Survey 2013

Abstract: Objective: The present study aimed to compare different indicators of obesity in the Serbian adult population. Design: Cross-sectional study. A stratified, two-stage, national-representative random sampling approach was used for the selection of the survey sample. Data sources were questionnaires created according to the European Health Interview Survey questionnaire. Measurements of weight, height and waist circumference (WC) were performed using standard procedures. Anthropometric measures included BMI, WC a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another finding that was compatible with other studies 41 , was the 12.7% discrepancy in the classification of overweight and normal weight individuals when they were classified using categorised WtHR versus categorised BMI. This difference may be because BMI considers the association between height and weight but not the bodily distribution of that weight, meaning that a very heavy athletic body with a narrow WC would tend to be classified as overweight by the BMI but as normal weight by the WtHR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another finding that was compatible with other studies 41 , was the 12.7% discrepancy in the classification of overweight and normal weight individuals when they were classified using categorised WtHR versus categorised BMI. This difference may be because BMI considers the association between height and weight but not the bodily distribution of that weight, meaning that a very heavy athletic body with a narrow WC would tend to be classified as overweight by the BMI but as normal weight by the WtHR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…15 Details about how the wealth index was calculated and other variables were determined have been provided elsewhere. 13,15,16 Statistical analysis Continuous variables were described in terms of means and standard deviations, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Prevalence rates with appropriate 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the six categories of body mass index (BMI), separately for males and females.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent studies, it is 82.2 kg for men and 72.6 kg for women [ 19 ]. These values are comparable for a number of countries both in Europe, Oceania, and North America [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%