2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dietary Intake Before vs After Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods in Mexico, 2012 to 2018

Abstract: ImportanceTax evaluations have shown effectiveness in reducing purchases of taxed items. However, few studies have looked at changes in overall dietary intake according to national surveys.ObjectiveTo estimate the contribution of taxed and untaxed beverages and foods to dietary intake over time, and the nutritional dietary profile in total beverages and foods consumed.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used data from 3 National Health and Nutrition Surveys of a nationally representativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Mexico, "buy less" responses ranged between 32% and 41% for taxed beverages [48], which is aligned with national survey data reporting a 6.3% reduction of taxed beverages puchases in the first year of tax implementation [51]. Subsequent comparisons of the dietary intake showed a decrease of -3.2% at 2 years and − 3.7% at 4 years post-implementation [52]. While it's likely that the trend reported by IFPS might be overestimated, it still aligns with the overall direction indicated by other data sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In Mexico, "buy less" responses ranged between 32% and 41% for taxed beverages [48], which is aligned with national survey data reporting a 6.3% reduction of taxed beverages puchases in the first year of tax implementation [51]. Subsequent comparisons of the dietary intake showed a decrease of -3.2% at 2 years and − 3.7% at 4 years post-implementation [52]. While it's likely that the trend reported by IFPS might be overestimated, it still aligns with the overall direction indicated by other data sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…But for other non-communicable diseases closely related to NAFLD, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, taxation reduced the consumption of sugar sweetened drinks, although intake of untaxed unhealthy foods increased. 50 Nevertheless, the evidence is unclear, with a 2020 Cochrane review indicating that despite a reduction in the consumption of taxed sugar added foods, there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of taxing unprocessed sugar or sugar added food on obesity and type 2 diabetes prevention. 51 Specific taxes on sugar, across all foods and not only in sweetened beverages, produced a significant health improvement.…”
Section: A Societal Approach To Preventing Nafldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term trends in purchasing behaviour have been explored e.g. in Mexico, where a tax was added to SSBs in 2014, there is evidence shows sustained effects through 2018 in consumer purchasing patterns [ 14 ]. However, longer term effects on manufacturer and retailer responses are less well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%