1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00075-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of diameter-distribution-prediction, stand-table-projection, and individual-tree-growth modeling approaches for young red alder plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1973, based on the study proposed by Bailey and Dell (1973), the Weibull function (MUrTHy et al, 2004) has been widely used in forestry TUrNBULL, 1981;CaO, 2004;CLUTTEr;aLLiSON, 1974;HaFLEy;SCHrEUDEr, 1977;KNOWE et al, 1997;MaTNEy;SULLiVaN, 1982;NOGUEira et al, 2005;PaLaHÍ et al, 2006PaLaHÍ et al, , 2007. a pdf may be fitted by methods of moments (FraziEr, 1981), percentiles (BaiLEy et al, 1989), maximum likelihood (FiSHEr, 1922), by combining methods of moments and percentiles (BaLDWiN JUNiOr;FEDUCCia, 1987), or by heuristic methods (aBBaSi et al, 2006(aBBaSi et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Binoti D H B Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 1973, based on the study proposed by Bailey and Dell (1973), the Weibull function (MUrTHy et al, 2004) has been widely used in forestry TUrNBULL, 1981;CaO, 2004;CLUTTEr;aLLiSON, 1974;HaFLEy;SCHrEUDEr, 1977;KNOWE et al, 1997;MaTNEy;SULLiVaN, 1982;NOGUEira et al, 2005;PaLaHÍ et al, 2006PaLaHÍ et al, , 2007. a pdf may be fitted by methods of moments (FraziEr, 1981), percentiles (BaiLEy et al, 1989), maximum likelihood (FiSHEr, 1922), by combining methods of moments and percentiles (BaLDWiN JUNiOr;FEDUCCia, 1987), or by heuristic methods (aBBaSi et al, 2006(aBBaSi et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Binoti D H B Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functions were fitted using the maximum likelihood method, with software kyplot Version 2.0 beta 15 (1997( -2001c. Functions having a location parameter were fitted with and without the parameter, as it can be replaced by the minimum diameter of the stand (CLUTTEr et al, 1983).…”
Section: Function Fitting and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…separating past cumulative competitive interactions from current stage of development. For even-aged stands, it is generally accepted that smaller trees have less diameter growth than larger trees, and trees in stands with low basal area exhibit greater growth than trees in stands with higher basal area (Knowe et al, 1997). The most significant predictor of a tree growth is its current size, which is a reflection of its past competitive interactions (Bevilacqua, 1999).…”
Section: Modeling Diameter Increment In Pinus Occidentalis 171mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average tree diameter of 38 cm can be reached after 25 to 30 years on good sites with stand volumes of 275 m 3 /hectare [84]). The site index and height growth equations developed from natural stands [71] may underestimate potential height and volume growth of plantations at moderate to moderately high densities [85].…”
Section: Height Growth Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red alder is expected to die out of these stands but it is unclear how long this will take. Some researchers in Pacific Northwest have reported that by 50 years most alder stands were breaking up and few stands remain intact beyond 100 years [85]. Newton and Cole [79] report for stands in Oregon that all alders will succumb in less than 130 yearsThe presence of alders may mitigate the intense stage of stem exclusion in pure conifer even-aged stands in Alaska [38,94] and these mixed alder-conifer stands allows more light for development of understory plants.…”
Section: All Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%