Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1094/pdis.1997.81.5.525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Detection Methods for Citrus Tristeza Virus in Field Trees During Months of Nonoptimal Titer

Abstract: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can reliably detect citrus tristeza virus (CTV) in samples collected during approximately 6 months of a typical year. Two reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods (total nucleic acid extract and immunocapture based) were evaluated and compared to ELISA in order to develop a more sensitive assay for CTV. From May 1994 to October 1995, 6 sweet orange trees infected with CTV from each of 2 geographic areas (Riverside and the San Joaquin Valley) wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with previously reported studies of virus titres and sampling times by various researchers on different citrus hosts (Garnsey et al 1987;mathews et al 1997;Korkmaz 2002;Cambra et al 2004) and in Satsuma mandarins (Cambra et al 2002). For testing samples collected at different times, DTBia results were as good as eLiSa results under field conditions.…”
Section: Biological Indexingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is in agreement with previously reported studies of virus titres and sampling times by various researchers on different citrus hosts (Garnsey et al 1987;mathews et al 1997;Korkmaz 2002;Cambra et al 2004) and in Satsuma mandarins (Cambra et al 2002). For testing samples collected at different times, DTBia results were as good as eLiSa results under field conditions.…”
Section: Biological Indexingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The RT-PCR technique is highly sensitive, simple and useful in overcoming difficulties encountered with serological methods, such as low antigen titer, availability of antibodies and cross-reactivity of antibodies with heterologous antigens (Mattews et al 1997). It also seems that RT-PCR is faster than traditional methods; so, it can be concluded from our study that the RT-PCR assay has a great sensitivity which enables the detection of BCMV in infected samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As ELISA lacks the sensitivity required for the detection of plant viruses, which occur in very low concentrations in infected tissues, many workers have used RT-PCR for indexing of different viruses to overcome this problem [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The procedure is extremely sensitive, fairly inexpensive and requires minimal skills to perform [35].…”
Section: Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%