1964
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.121.5.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Desipramine and Imipramine in Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with other groups using the HRS total score for such classification of patients. 17 3. The sum of concentrations of imipramine and desipramine should be calculated after multiplying the concentration value of one of the compounds with factors from 0.1 to 10.…”
Section: Antidepressant Levels Of Imipramine 321mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with other groups using the HRS total score for such classification of patients. 17 3. The sum of concentrations of imipramine and desipramine should be calculated after multiplying the concentration value of one of the compounds with factors from 0.1 to 10.…”
Section: Antidepressant Levels Of Imipramine 321mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 It might, therefore, be hypothesized that effects on both serotonin and noradrenalin transmitters are needed for the clinical antidepressive effect. However, the fact that desipramine per se has antidepressive effect 17 indicates that the interaction between imipramine and desipramine is more complex. The antidepressive effect of desipramine has, on the other hand, been claimed to be weaker than that of other tricyclic antidepressants.…”
Section: Antidepressant Levels Of Imipramine 323mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is clozapine a potent antagonist for D4 receptor, it is so for D I , Dz, a,-adrenergic, 5HTz serotonergic, cholinergic, histaminergic, etc (Tamminga and Gerlach, 1987). Typical neuroleptics such as chlorpromazine or haloperidol are also Rose and Westhead, 1964Lauritsen and Madsen, 1974Rickels er al., 1981Santonastaso et al, 1979Stassen et al, 1993Lecrubier et af., 1980Brogden et a/., 1978Angst et al, 1977Kampman et al. 1978Montgomery et al, 1981Laursen et af., 1985Gravem et al, 1987Dominguez et al, 1985Bremner, 1984Reimherr et al, 1990Naylor and Martin, 1985Dahl et al, 1982LOO et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%