2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…HPV types 16 and 18 cause 60%‐70% of cervical cancers worldwide, and other HR‐HPV types cause virtually all remaining cases. Wheeler et al found that HPV16 was the most prevalent single HPV genotype in the general population and was 2‐3 times more prevalent than the other HPV genotypes . Hariri et al reported that HPV16 was also found to be the most prevalent among the genotypes classified as oncogenic in women aged ≥25 years .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HPV types 16 and 18 cause 60%‐70% of cervical cancers worldwide, and other HR‐HPV types cause virtually all remaining cases. Wheeler et al found that HPV16 was the most prevalent single HPV genotype in the general population and was 2‐3 times more prevalent than the other HPV genotypes . Hariri et al reported that HPV16 was also found to be the most prevalent among the genotypes classified as oncogenic in women aged ≥25 years .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the 2015 Interim Clinical Guidance, women positive for HPV16/18 should be referred to colposcopy immediately, but for women with other HR‐HPV genotypes, if the cytology was negative, they can be followed up within 12 months . Chatzistamatiou et al also suggested HPV testing with HPV16/18 genotyping, referring HPV16/18 positive women directly to colposcopy and HR‐HPV (non‐HPV16/18)‐positive women to reflex cytology (ASCUS threshold) as a triage method to colposcopy, which reflects the best balance between screening effectiveness and harm . However, based on our data from Chinese women, other HR‐HPV genotypes alone or mixed infections accounted for 67.17% of the total number of infections, and the prevalence of HSIL was 10.42%, although there was no significant difference in the ratio of HSIL and more severe lesions caused by non‐HPV 16/18 genotype between the age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interim clinical guidance for cervical cancer screening proposed by most of the relevant American Societies and Colleges (SGO, ASCCP, ACOG, ACS, ASCytopathol, CAP and ASCP), after the accumulating evidence on primary HPV screening and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Cobas HPV test [Roche Molecular Systems, Incorporated, Pleasanton, California (http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm3947http://73.htm)] for this purpose, incorporates HPV primary screening with HPV 16/18 genotyping and reflex cytology for hrHPV (non16/18) positive women. This screening algorithm has proven more effective, and in some cases less expensive than others …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries with an organized screening program, cervical cytology (Pap-smear) is the most common diagnostic test. Due to the low sensitivity of cytology (5)(6)(7)(8), co-testing of HPV together with cytology has been introduced in the United States (9). The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the use HPV test as the primary screening test and that HPV infected women are followed up with colposcopy.…”
Section: Graphical Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%