2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of creasing and scoring in the manufacturing of folding cartons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i) that was also graded as unacceptable but with just visible damage by one expert (N = 1). Both of the samples have folds parallel to the fiber direction which usually has better folding properties(Giampieri et al, 2011;Leminen et al, 2021). The damage to the top layer is less which can be seen in the previously mentioned sample figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…i) that was also graded as unacceptable but with just visible damage by one expert (N = 1). Both of the samples have folds parallel to the fiber direction which usually has better folding properties(Giampieri et al, 2011;Leminen et al, 2021). The damage to the top layer is less which can be seen in the previously mentioned sample figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For cutting layout sheets a Z10 drag blade was used and a creasing wheel C203 with a diameter of 15 mm, a width of 0,7 mm, and a depth of a maximum of 1 mm. Which, according to previous research, is most similar in size of a die-cut creasing ruler (Giampieri et al, 2011;Huang and Nygårds, 2011;Leminen et al, 2021) The samples were creased in 3 depth levels: 0,5 mm, 0,7 mm and 0,9 mm with the measured force of 6,88 N, 10,2 N and 13,58 N respectively. The samples were named according to the variables presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The blanks produced are then folded to a final package shape, which are expected to have undamaged edges (Domaneschi et al 2017). Production of folding lines is also possible using other processes, for example, paperboard scoring (Leminen et al 2021), and several works mentioned below have examined different paperboard treatment methods for package forming. Of the creasing processes available, two are the most frequently mentioned in the studies reviewed.…”
Section: Converting By Cutting and Creasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring can be done mechanically (e.g., by knife) or by laser, resulting in continuous or dashed cuts, which respond to folding differently (Mentrasti et al 2013). All four methods were studied by Leminen et al (2021), and the results were reported to differ as regards the dimensions of the folding lines made: creased grooves were much wider than scored ones, but their depths were still comparable. According to the study, the flatbed die-cutting process performs best with wider grooves in the matrix (Leminen et al 2019) and results in a lower force being required to fold the sample (see further sections).…”
Section: Converting By Cutting and Creasingmentioning
confidence: 99%