2013
DOI: 10.1532/hsf98.20131006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Conventional and No-Touch Techniques in Harvesting Saphenous Vein for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in View of Endothelial Damage

Abstract: Endothelial integrity and adenosine, iNOS, and VEGF immunoreactivities were better preserved when the no-touch technique was used for vein graft harvesting. The mechanical protection provided by the cushion of surrounding tissue in the no-touch group and the vasorelaxation and thromboresistant activities of nitric oxide may be responsible for the reduction in vasospasms and the improved patency rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it has not been determined whether EC denudation and loss is purely mechanical or is driven by EC activation and apoptosis in response to acute changes in unconditioned ECs. It is widely accepted that harvesting and implantation of LSV impacts on EC integrity to some degree [72] , though recent studies using improved surgical resection suggest that the endothelium is better preserved following surgery [73,74] . However, these studies fail to address the degree of dysfunction in the preserved endothelium.…”
Section: Intimal Hyperplasia and The Endotheliummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has not been determined whether EC denudation and loss is purely mechanical or is driven by EC activation and apoptosis in response to acute changes in unconditioned ECs. It is widely accepted that harvesting and implantation of LSV impacts on EC integrity to some degree [72] , though recent studies using improved surgical resection suggest that the endothelium is better preserved following surgery [73,74] . However, these studies fail to address the degree of dysfunction in the preserved endothelium.…”
Section: Intimal Hyperplasia and The Endotheliummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) The preservation of the adventitial vasa vasorum and signs of normal cellular integrity demonstrated that the "no-touch" technique did not cause mechanical or pressure damage to the vessel wall. 16) LIMA graft is commonly harvested with a pedicle of surrounding tissue and is also avoided from dilation. The high patency rate of this arterial graft can partly be ascribed to the "no-touch" harvesting technique, especially for the beginner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bridging technique, which involves making several smaller “skip incisions,” was identified as an effective solution in reducing wound complications in comparison with the long incision approach . The conventional saphenectomy approach involves the longitudinal opening of the fascial canal surrounding the vein, formed predominantly by adipose tissue . In doing so, the adventitial layer is invariably damaged, leading to saphenous vein venospasm .…”
Section: Conventional Open Vein Harvesting Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional saphenectomy approach involves the longitudinal opening of the fascial canal surrounding the vein, formed predominantly by adipose tissue . In doing so, the adventitial layer is invariably damaged, leading to saphenous vein venospasm . The high distension pressures required to overcome venospasm and to check for vascular leaks before graft implantation induces substantial damage to the vein at an ultrastructural level .…”
Section: Conventional Open Vein Harvesting Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%