2019
DOI: 10.5603/fm.a2019.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to compare the morphological differences in the mandible between patients with six age groups and to detect the correlation between these parameters on panoramic radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: A total of 121 subjects (50 males and 71 females) were included in the study and were divided into six age groups (10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69) on the basis of the chronological age. CBCT and PR methods were used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If they did not differ greatly, the OPG was considered as acceptable. Secondly, the distance from the most cranial point of the condyle to gonial inferior point was measured bilaterally, similar to the methodology of Tassoker et al 15 The tooth crown was scored as presenting either normal, microdontic or macrodontic morphology (except for lateral incisors in the upper jaw, which were scored either as microdontic or normal). The thickness, length and resorption of the completely developed roots of the permanent teeth were assessed as normal, short, thin or roots with resorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they did not differ greatly, the OPG was considered as acceptable. Secondly, the distance from the most cranial point of the condyle to gonial inferior point was measured bilaterally, similar to the methodology of Tassoker et al 15 The tooth crown was scored as presenting either normal, microdontic or macrodontic morphology (except for lateral incisors in the upper jaw, which were scored either as microdontic or normal). The thickness, length and resorption of the completely developed roots of the permanent teeth were assessed as normal, short, thin or roots with resorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Radiographic examinations are essential in diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry, but panoramic radiography is less reliable than 3D images, and is not recommended for measurements due to the lack of repeatability. 21,[25][26][27] Cone-beam computed tomography has a wide range of applications for evaluating dental fractures and cracks, measuring the size of periapical lesions, assessing bone density in lesion areas, conducting endodontic surgery, planning implants, and analyzing TMJs and resorption. 28 High-resolution CBCT has become notably effective for confirming anatomical variations in the mandibular canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tambuwala et al [ 17 ] and Baykul et al [ 29 ] analysed the pericoronal radiolucent areas (dental follicles) of impacted mandibular molars using panoramic radiographs. However, panoramic radiographs are two-dimensional overlapping images, and interpretation of the width of the pericoronal radiolucent area might be not accurate [ 30 , 31 ]. Therefore, CBCT was used in this study, as a three-dimensional imaging detection method to accurately measure the maximum width of the dental follicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%