2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of community structure and soil characteristics in different aged Pinus sylvestris plantations and a natural pine forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results of higher density of individuals are reported from natural pine forests in NW Spain (Marcos et al 2007). The maximum basal area reached on the studied PRP in 2015 was 39.7 m 2 ha -1 , quite distinctly exceeding the value of 30.6 m 2 ha -1 reported from pinewoods in N Sweden (Mellander et al 2007).…”
Section: Diameter Growth With Respect To Environmental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar results of higher density of individuals are reported from natural pine forests in NW Spain (Marcos et al 2007). The maximum basal area reached on the studied PRP in 2015 was 39.7 m 2 ha -1 , quite distinctly exceeding the value of 30.6 m 2 ha -1 reported from pinewoods in N Sweden (Mellander et al 2007).…”
Section: Diameter Growth With Respect To Environmental Conditionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that secondary forest to plantation conversions need to be evaluated on a case-bycase basis, and the value of this land-use change depends to a large degree on the objectives of the plantation. While plantation forests can result in rapid development of a forest structure beneficial for some wildlife species (Duran and Kattan 2005), it is widely believed plantations generally have less developed understories due to the intensity of site preparation (Marcos et al 2007), frequent uniformity of plantation forest structure (Barlow et al 2007a;Aubin et al 2008), and changes in ecological processes of decomposition and litterfall (Barlow et al 2007b). In some locations, secondary forests ''…are essentially forest fallows subject to reclearing'' (Putz and Redford 2010, p. 16), while in many parts of Europe, where few primary forests remain, the distinction between secondary forest and very old plantations may be blurred and plantations are seen as playing an important role in biodiversity conservation (Humphrey 2005, Brockerhoff et al 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as Sustainable Forest Management is now a global objective, forest policy must address biodiversity, conservation and 20 social objectives according to the principles of sustainable development. Recent research suggests that plantation forests can support a relatively diverse flora and fauna in comparison with seminatural or naturally regenerating forests (Kattan et al, 2006;Marcos et al, 2007;Taboada et al, 2008), and has recognised their contribution to biodiversity in landscapes dominated by intensive agriculture (Oxbrough et al, 2007). In Ireland approximately 10% of the land area is forested, but 25 only 1% is native or semi-natural woodlands (Forest Service, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%