1989
DOI: 10.1021/ie00096a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of coke burning on catalysts coked in a commercial plant and in the laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because nitrogen does not possess the ability of hydrogen in converting coke precursors to harmless hydrocarbons. It should be noted here that Pieck and Perera, 1989 reported otherwise that the nature of the coke found on the laboratory coked catalyst was different from that produced on the commercially coked catalyst in that the former was richer in hydrogen. The uncertainty here had been whether the transformation undergone on the reforming catalyst to achieve the mortal state in the laboratory could be extrapolated to the industrial catalyst, where hydrogen is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This is because nitrogen does not possess the ability of hydrogen in converting coke precursors to harmless hydrocarbons. It should be noted here that Pieck and Perera, 1989 reported otherwise that the nature of the coke found on the laboratory coked catalyst was different from that produced on the commercially coked catalyst in that the former was richer in hydrogen. The uncertainty here had been whether the transformation undergone on the reforming catalyst to achieve the mortal state in the laboratory could be extrapolated to the industrial catalyst, where hydrogen is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%