2011
DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2011.n.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical-Pathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of True Interval and Screen-Detected Invasive Breast Cancer Among Participants of a Canadian Breast Screening Program: A Nested Case-Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Less favourable size, grading and biomarker expression were found in interval cancers compared to screen-detected cancers [7,43,44]. The higher frequency of triple negative interval cancers compared with the screen-detected cancers was also identified in other studies, conveying a more aggressive behaviour and adverse prognosis to these tumours [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Less favourable size, grading and biomarker expression were found in interval cancers compared to screen-detected cancers [7,43,44]. The higher frequency of triple negative interval cancers compared with the screen-detected cancers was also identified in other studies, conveying a more aggressive behaviour and adverse prognosis to these tumours [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…While screening rates are often lower in low SES populations, this does not wholly account for the high grade nature of the tumors seen in these populations. High grade, locally advanced tumors are more likely to present between screenings as interval cancers [72]. While this is a relatively small study, it provides characterization of serial patients seen at a public safety-net hospital, who have a strikingly high proportion of cases with elevated PCNA ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…True interval cancers show increased tumor cell proliferation (6,(10)(11)(12) and lower expression of both estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR; 6, 9, 12, 13) than screen-detected cancers. Some recent studies have found an enrichment of triple negative phenotype among true interval cancers (9,14,15). Lately, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms have been related to interval cancers, such as the methylation process of specific genes (16) or the action of growth factors produced in the breast stroma in response to tumoral aggressiveness (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%