2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical outcomes with the utilization of monitored anesthesia care vs. general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reviewed 35 full-text articles and identified 20 articles for inclusion in our review (figure 1). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] All the studies were observational studies except one RCT. 32 Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics of the included studies.…”
Section: Study Selection and Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed 35 full-text articles and identified 20 articles for inclusion in our review (figure 1). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] All the studies were observational studies except one RCT. 32 Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics of the included studies.…”
Section: Study Selection and Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After European and US centers, the safety and feasibility of TAVR with LA/CS compared to general anesthesia has been widely investigated in many clinical studies. 4,20,21 Although the strategy varies among studies, 21,22 the most common approach consists of infiltration of lidocaine at the access site, and administration of remifentanyl or fentanyl associated with propofol and/or midazolam. Transfemoral approach is the most commonly used and preferred access site.…”
Section: Local Anesthesia/conscious Sedationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,26 LA/CS were associated with lower rates of systemic hypertension and subsequent intra and post-procedural inotropic support, and potentially lower pulmonary complications rate, like the incidence of respiratory failure and pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation. 22,23 As a result, early recovery after the procedure can be achieved, leading to a shorter length of post-procedural ICU stay and LOS, 12,20,22,25,27 e.g. mean 1.5-2.1 days shorter in LOS under LA/CS than under general anesthesia.…”
Section: Local Anesthesia/conscious Sedationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations