1985
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(85)90012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Chase and inertial brake Dynamometer testing of automotive friction materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wear is usually reported in terms of weight loss of the pad and thickness loss for the drum. A comparison of Chase Machine data for several material combinations with that from an inertial dynamometer was reported by Tsang et al (1985). The test results from the two machines were inconsistent.…”
Section: The Chase Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear is usually reported in terms of weight loss of the pad and thickness loss for the drum. A comparison of Chase Machine data for several material combinations with that from an inertial dynamometer was reported by Tsang et al (1985). The test results from the two machines were inconsistent.…”
Section: The Chase Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inertial dynamometer is used to evaluate full sized brakes but this is a very time consuming and expensive process. In contrast, the CHASE dynamometer uses a small amount of friction material rubbing against a drum and it requires a shorter testing time than the inertial dynamometer [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inertia dynamometer is used to evaluate a full size brake lining material or brake system by simulating vehicles braking process but it is time consuming and more expensive. On a smaller scale, CHASE dynamometer features low capital expenditure and shorter test time (Tsang, 1985). Chase machine uses a small sample of friction material with a size of 1 inch x 1 inch x 0.25 inch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%