2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of CFD-DEM and TFM simulations of single bubble injection in 3D gas-fluidized beds with MRI results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, showing that MFM simulations can successfully capture the rising of granular bubble as a whole and in conditions without any gas bubbles is of great value, considering that MFM is a continuum modeling approach. For comparison, it should be noted that a number of prior works involving numerical modeling of gas bubbles in fluidized beds have demonstrated significant deviations in the prediction of the shape and rise velocity of gas bubbles when compared to experiments 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even so, showing that MFM simulations can successfully capture the rising of granular bubble as a whole and in conditions without any gas bubbles is of great value, considering that MFM is a continuum modeling approach. For comparison, it should be noted that a number of prior works involving numerical modeling of gas bubbles in fluidized beds have demonstrated significant deviations in the prediction of the shape and rise velocity of gas bubbles when compared to experiments 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, it should be noted that a number of prior works involving numerical modeling of gas bubbles in fluidized beds have demonstrated significant deviations in the prediction of the shape and rise velocity of gas bubbles when compared to experiments. 41 With the Schaeffer model 16 turned off, Figure S2 shows that large gas bubbles appear and gas channels into these gas bubbles, but not the granular bubble. As a result, although the granular bubble can still rise to the top, it displays a tendency to percolate through the bed.…”
Section: Effect Of the Packing Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar bed pressure drops and gas volume fractions were observed using both approaches in the bubbling FB. A comparison of bubble rise velocity and bubble wake was performed using the CFD-DEM and TFM with classical KTGF in an air–particle FB ( d s = 3.0 mm and ρ s = 1040 kg/m 3 ) . The density ratio ρ s /ρ g was about 848.9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Two-fluid modeling (TFM) has been widely used in the literature, , simulating gas and particles as interpenetrating continua using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), utilizing constitutive relationships to model an effective stress of the particle phase and coupling gas and solid flow using a drag law. The governing equations and constitutive relationships used for TFM are shown below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%