2012
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Responses During 2 Incremental Step Tests in Subjects With COPD

Abstract: The slower the work rate increment during step test, the higher the exercise tolerance. Regardless of the work rate increment, cardiopulmonary stress and exertion effort at peak exercise were equivalent between tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Costa et al 44 Marrara et al 47 Pessoa et al 49 Pessoa et al 21 Marino Step Test Marrara et al 47 Camargo et al 10 6MST CST ---Fair…”
Section: Number Of Repetitionsunclassified
“…Costa et al 44 Marrara et al 47 Pessoa et al 49 Pessoa et al 21 Marino Step Test Marrara et al 47 Camargo et al 10 6MST CST ---Fair…”
Section: Number Of Repetitionsunclassified
“…In moderate to severe COPD, this test was reproducible for step number (ICC = 0.99) and physiological parameters (ICCs [ 0.93) [55], although a learning effect was demonstrated. However, VO 2 peak was higher in MIST compared to the CST in COPD [72].…”
Section: Modified Incremental Step Test (Mist)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The MIST is similar to the CST, but with a slower initial step rate (10 steps/min) and incremental size (2 steps/min), with the same criteria for test cessation [55,72], with the addition of an inability to maintain the pace for 15 s [72]. In moderate to severe COPD, this test was reproducible for step number (ICC = 0.99) and physiological parameters (ICCs [ 0.93) [55], although a learning effect was demonstrated.…”
Section: Modified Incremental Step Test (Mist)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workload (watts) was estimated based on the following formula: step height (m) × number of cycles × weight (kg) × 0.16357. 9 This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidad San Sebastián; each participant's legal guardian was asked to sign an informed consent. The study was conducted between September and December 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%