2014
DOI: 10.5455/2349-3259.ijct20141104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cardiac vagal activity between pre and postmenopausal women using heart rate recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For HR, the observations made went further and showed that this variable exhibited a considerable inertia when preceded by a higher level of physical activity, as can be seen in Figure 5 (i.e., delayed effect of task presentation order, see Table 1; more specifically, a continued effect of level 4 on level 2 can be seen). This delay in HR decrease during recovery from a higher level of physical effort is a well-known effect (Shetler et al, 2001;Vijayalakshmi et al, 2014). In healthy subjects, a decrease of 15-20 beats per minute in the first minute of recovery has been shown to be typical (Shetler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Open-loop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For HR, the observations made went further and showed that this variable exhibited a considerable inertia when preceded by a higher level of physical activity, as can be seen in Figure 5 (i.e., delayed effect of task presentation order, see Table 1; more specifically, a continued effect of level 4 on level 2 can be seen). This delay in HR decrease during recovery from a higher level of physical effort is a well-known effect (Shetler et al, 2001;Vijayalakshmi et al, 2014). In healthy subjects, a decrease of 15-20 beats per minute in the first minute of recovery has been shown to be typical (Shetler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Open-loop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The differences in standard deviation between HAO and HDM for both dominance and valence can be neglected (i.e., 0.07 and 0.59, respectively). The combination of high dominance (i.e., feeling under control of the situation) and high valence (i.e., pleasure) while still being challenged is likely to influence motivation and, thus, to promote future practice and total duration of training, which, in turn, might influence the success of motor learning (Shetler et al, 2001;Guadagnoli and Lee, 2004;Vijayalakshmi et al, 2014).…”
Section: User Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HR, the observations made went further and showed that this variable exhibited a considerable inertia when preceded by a higher level of physical activity, as can be seen in Figure 5 (i.e., delayed effect of task presentation order, see Table 1 ; more specifically, a continued effect of level 4 on level 2 can be seen). This delay in HR decrease during recovery from a higher level of physical effort is a well-known effect (Shetler et al, 2001 ; Vijayalakshmi et al, 2014 ). In healthy subjects, a decrease of 15–20 beats per minute in the first minute of recovery has been shown to be typical (Shetler et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The differences in standard deviation between HAO and HDM for both dominance and valence can be neglected (i.e., 0.07 and 0.59, respectively). The combination of high dominance (i.e., feeling under control of the situation) and high valence (i.e., pleasure) while still being challenged is likely to influence motivation and, thus, to promote future practice and total duration of training, which, in turn, might influence the success of motor learning (Shetler et al, 2001 ; Guadagnoli and Lee, 2004 ; Vijayalakshmi et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%