Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of carbon-ion passive and scanning irradiation for pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shiomi et at. [27] evaluated, how the use of specific beam directions might increase the plan robustness for the case of passive and active delivery systems. Moreover, a complementary approach is the use of abdominal compression to reduce the motion amplitude and additional beam rescanning to mitigate the interplay effect [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiomi et at. [27] evaluated, how the use of specific beam directions might increase the plan robustness for the case of passive and active delivery systems. Moreover, a complementary approach is the use of abdominal compression to reduce the motion amplitude and additional beam rescanning to mitigate the interplay effect [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIRT for passive irradiation was validated in this study. A similar effect would be observed in layer-stacking irradiation or scanning irradiation with CIRT, and these techniques might reduce the bowel dose more than passive irradiation because they have better conformity (14,15). Additionally, a similar effect would be observed in proton therapy because the proton beams also exhibit a Bragg peak and sharp dose distribution (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The volume of jawbone receiving more than 50 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions was found to be a risk factor of ORN . The technological advancements made in recent years in scanning‐beam and gantry‐based treatment delivery reduce the volume of the jawbone that is exposed to high‐dose irradiation, which may decrease the risk of ORN …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The technological advancements made in recent years in scanning-beam and gantry-based treatment delivery reduce the volume of the jawbone that is exposed to high-dose irradiation, which may decrease the risk of ORN. 34,35 C-ion RT is a promising treatment option for inoperable oral non-SCC. Since April 2018, the public health insurance system in Japan has covered C-ion RT for head and neck malignancies, with the exception of oral, laryngeal, and pharyngeal SCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%