2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Interval Methods for GSCA Using a Monte Carlo Simulation

Abstract: Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) is a theoretically well-founded approach to component-based structural equation modeling (SEM). This approach utilizes the bootstrap method to estimate the confidence intervals of its parameter estimates without recourse to distributional assumptions, such as multivariate normality. It currently provides the bootstrap percentile confidence intervals only. Recently, the potential usefulness of the bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap (BCa) confidence interval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude of the confidence interval in Figure 3 reflects the precision of the estimates for the maximum notes mode, given the GEV distribution. Other confidence intervals via bootstrap could be considered, such as bootstrap-t and BCa [37,38]. We emphasize that the strategy adopted is innovative in the context of sensory notes and the comparison of confidence intervals can be done as future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude of the confidence interval in Figure 3 reflects the precision of the estimates for the maximum notes mode, given the GEV distribution. Other confidence intervals via bootstrap could be considered, such as bootstrap-t and BCa [37,38]. We emphasize that the strategy adopted is innovative in the context of sensory notes and the comparison of confidence intervals can be done as future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 95% Con dence Intervals (CI) of the above-speci ed parameters were also calculated using a percentile bootstrap method based on 10 k samples [23]. The percentile method was chosen for its conservative nature, as it tends to produce wider CI less sensitive to population value and sample size [24]. To compare the maximum errors made between the Test-Retest trials and the Human-Software evaluations, we used a twotailed two-sample t-test [25], exploring the signi cant differences between measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized structured component analysis (GSCA) [56][57][58] was conducted to evaluate the proposed research model. GSCA is an approach to component-based structural equation modeling and works well with a small sample size without requiring rigid distributional assumptions such as multivariate normality [59][60][61]. Web-based software for GSCA was used for the analysis, available online at [62].…”
Section: Perceived Visual Designmentioning
confidence: 99%