1988
DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(88)90110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bone formed intramuscularly after transplantation of scapular and calvarial osteoblasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteogenic cells from endochondral bone such as scapulas and femurs have been suggested to have different properties than those from intramembranous bones such as calvaria (Moskalewski et al, 1988;Denkovski et al, 1994). Distinct osteoinductive factors in bone matrix andlor difference in cell properties may contribute to the different biological response The difference in the microenvironment of the imium, such as oxygen supply from vascularization (Bassett, 19611, or the mechanical stimulation given by surrounding muscle (Hall 1967(Hall , 1968, could affect the phenotype expression of the osteogenic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Osteogenic cells from endochondral bone such as scapulas and femurs have been suggested to have different properties than those from intramembranous bones such as calvaria (Moskalewski et al, 1988;Denkovski et al, 1994). Distinct osteoinductive factors in bone matrix andlor difference in cell properties may contribute to the different biological response The difference in the microenvironment of the imium, such as oxygen supply from vascularization (Bassett, 19611, or the mechanical stimulation given by surrounding muscle (Hall 1967(Hall , 1968, could affect the phenotype expression of the osteogenic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From previous reports, it was clear that there were substantial differences in the histology, and histochemical, biochemical, as well as chemical composition of bone matrices derived from intramembranous and endochondral bones 20,32,35,41,42 . The differences stated above strongly suggest that there is a distinction between the osteoblast cells of intramembranous bone and endochondral bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 0, 2 3 -2 5 As a consequence, intramembranous bone tends to be more preferred in craniofacial reconstructions, again with or without implant placement. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Intramembranous, mandibular symphysis grafts have shown less delayed resorption and less morbidity than extraoral endochondral grafts. 3 6, 3 7 The placement of implants in areas grafted with chin bone has been documented.…”
Section: Discussion and Criteria Of Choicementioning
confidence: 99%