2010
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.21069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of body fat estimates using 3D digital laser scans, direct manual anthropometry, and DXA in men

Abstract: Correlation coefficients and SEE results for this sample were: (1) DXA vs 3DS; r = 0.74, SEE = 3.2, (2) MA vs DXA; r = 0.82, SEE = 2.8, and (3) MA vs 3DS; r = 0.96, SEE = 1.0. Lin's concordance analysis, including Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA), revealed statistically significant measurement agreement among the three measurement modalities (p < 0.05). The application of 3DS scanning to estimate percent BF from commonly used anthropometric measurements are in close agreement with BF estimates derived fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body fatness predicted with 3D imaging was significantly correlated with HD reference values with a wide distribution of the values (SEE = 7.95%). Garlie et al [18] also reported no differences in body fat values among military personnel measured with 3D optical imaging, DXA, and military-specific anthropometric models. They noted, however, a higher concordance correlation coefficient for 3D imaging compared to anthropometry rather than to 3D imaging compared to DXA (0.96 vs. 0.74).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Body fatness predicted with 3D imaging was significantly correlated with HD reference values with a wide distribution of the values (SEE = 7.95%). Garlie et al [18] also reported no differences in body fat values among military personnel measured with 3D optical imaging, DXA, and military-specific anthropometric models. They noted, however, a higher concordance correlation coefficient for 3D imaging compared to anthropometry rather than to 3D imaging compared to DXA (0.96 vs. 0.74).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although widely publicized and used as fat analyzers, BIA devices are limited in accuracy in terms of assessing body fat largely due to several faulty assumptions such as a steady hydration of the lean tissues [13,14,15]. Alternatively, whole-body optical scanning devices to estimate body volume, size, and regional body circumferences are emerging [16,17,18,19]. They yield reasonably accurate measurements but require relatively costly and cumbersome equipment, large space requirements and lighting that makes them impractical for routine personal use [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, application of such a protocol requires subjects to breathe out fully whilst being scanned, which might be limiting for some individuals as it is for UWW. A study of military personnel found good agreement between % fat derived from 3D scanning (Cyberware) with in-house software and DXA (GE Lunar Prodigy) [55] , although the strategy for assessing the lung volume to subtract from scan volume before calculation of % fat was not stated. In this respect, 3D and DXA scanning share the commonality of "undisclosed algorithms" for arriving at fatness and thereby, unquantified error, which future research must address.…”
Section: Ultrasound (Us)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 3-D body scanners for studying obesity is not new; several scanner manufacturers provide software tools to collect sets of measurements that can be used to analyze the body shape, and these anthropometric data have been recently correlated with metabolic parameters in validation studies [11], [12], [13], [14]. Methods used to extract measurements in these studies are, however, not standardized, usually require standard posture and compute girths at landmarks derived by markers or manually corrected in case of failure of automatic detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%