1986
DOI: 10.2307/2425751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Biomass Recovery after Fire of a Seeder (Ceratiola ericoides) and a Sprouter (Quercus inopina) Species from South-Central Florida

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that there may be little sharing of reserves among ramets and that there is limited integration of ramets within the same genotype in the absence of fire, as individual oak clones typically contain a mix of small and large ramets (Johnson, Abrahamson, and McCrea, 1986; A. F. Johnson and W. G. Abrahamson, unpublished data). Longterm data for oak size-class distribution within these vegetation associations and for individual ramets of Q. inopina show that ramets of a single genotype do not senesce at the same size or age and that there is appreciable turnover of ramets even in the absence of fire (Givens et al, 1984;Menges et al, 1993;A.…”
Section: Influence Of Ramet Size and Vegetation Association Onmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results suggest that there may be little sharing of reserves among ramets and that there is limited integration of ramets within the same genotype in the absence of fire, as individual oak clones typically contain a mix of small and large ramets (Johnson, Abrahamson, and McCrea, 1986; A. F. Johnson and W. G. Abrahamson, unpublished data). Longterm data for oak size-class distribution within these vegetation associations and for individual ramets of Q. inopina show that ramets of a single genotype do not senesce at the same size or age and that there is appreciable turnover of ramets even in the absence of fire (Givens et al, 1984;Menges et al, 1993;A.…”
Section: Influence Of Ramet Size and Vegetation Association Onmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The lifetime fitness of plants growing in resource-limited environments, such as these oaks, would likely increase if reproduction during less favorable times is postponed in order to survive unfavorable conditions, gain vegetative mass to facilitate greater future reproductive output, or accumulate the resources necessary to produce a more sizeable fruit crop in a subsequent year (Abrahamson and Gadgil 1973, Abrahamson 1979, Waller 1979, Silvertown 1980, Sork 1993b, Sork et al 1993. Indeed, an examination of biomass allocation in Q. inopina, the most clonal of the five oaks studied, found that on average only ϳ25% of each ramet's mass is allocated to aboveground organs (Johnson et al 1986). This allocation pattern is one that implies the importance of mass accumulation and longevity.…”
Section: Endogenous Cycles and External Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasional high-intensity ®res kill standing Florida rosemary individuals, enlarge open sand areas and decrease lichen cover (Johnson 1982;Abrahamson et al 1984;Abrahamson 1984a, b;Myers 1985Myers , 1990Menges and Kohfeldt 1995;Hawkes and Menges 1996). The slow recovery growth rate of Florida rosemary and lichens, and limited colonization of available space by other woody species, allow large openings to persist in the rosemary scrub for decades after a ®re (Johnson et al 1986;Hawkes and Menges 1996). These sandy open areas in the rosemary scrub provide microhabitats for a large group of endangered and endemic herb species (Abrahamson et al 1984a;Christman and Judd 1990;Menges 1995, 1996;Menges and Kimmich 1996), many of which are killed by ®re and regenerate from seeds (Abrahamson 1984a;Johnson and Abrahamson 1990;Hawkes and Menges 1995;Menges and Kohfeldt 1995;Menges and Kimmich 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%