2010
DOI: 10.1108/s1569-3767(2010)0000011016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of banking efficiency in Europe: Islamic versus conventional banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies (two of which are in the GCC context) find that Islamic banks are significantly less efficient than conventional ones (Mokhtar et al 2007;Srairi 2010;Kamarudin et al 2014;Mobarek and Kalonov 2014), while other studies (two of which are in the GCC context) suggest that Islamic banks are significantly more efficient than conventional banks (Al-Jarrah and Molyneux 2006;Al-Muharrami 2008;Olson and Zoubi 2008). The vast majority of frontier studies, however, find no significant difference between the two bank types (El-Gamal and Inanoglu 2005;Grigorian and Manole 2005;Mokhtar et al 2006;Bader 2008;Mohamad et al 2008;Hassan et al 2009), or else the significance of the difference between the two bank systems is not tested (Hussein 2004;Al-Jarrah and Molyneux 2005;Ahmad and Luo 2010;Said 2012). However, caution is needed regarding some studies where either the sample size -particularly the number of Islamic banks -is small or a variety of countries with markedly economies has been utilised; thus, making the isolation of an "Islamic banking" effect difficult.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (two of which are in the GCC context) find that Islamic banks are significantly less efficient than conventional ones (Mokhtar et al 2007;Srairi 2010;Kamarudin et al 2014;Mobarek and Kalonov 2014), while other studies (two of which are in the GCC context) suggest that Islamic banks are significantly more efficient than conventional banks (Al-Jarrah and Molyneux 2006;Al-Muharrami 2008;Olson and Zoubi 2008). The vast majority of frontier studies, however, find no significant difference between the two bank types (El-Gamal and Inanoglu 2005;Grigorian and Manole 2005;Mokhtar et al 2006;Bader 2008;Mohamad et al 2008;Hassan et al 2009), or else the significance of the difference between the two bank systems is not tested (Hussein 2004;Al-Jarrah and Molyneux 2005;Ahmad and Luo 2010;Said 2012). However, caution is needed regarding some studies where either the sample size -particularly the number of Islamic banks -is small or a variety of countries with markedly economies has been utilised; thus, making the isolation of an "Islamic banking" effect difficult.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) virtual communities Islamic banks have more focused on the redistribution of wealth by making investments that can enhance well-being and social justice among Islamic and developing countries (Johnes et al, 2014;Kumar et al, 2010;Ahmad and Luo, 2010). On the other hand, the prime objective of conventional banks is to earn profit without focusing on the welfare of social communities (Iqbal and Molyneux, 2016;Naeem, 2019b).…”
Section: Social Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, we test whether oil price–bank risk nexus is different across conventional banks and Islamic banks. Islamic banks are driven by the principle of profit-sharing in Islamic Shariah law, making them different from traditional ones in terms of asset-liability structure, and thus the composition of NPLs (Ahmad and Luo, 2010; Ho, 2015; Hassan and Aliyu, 2018; AlAbbad et al , 2019). Results are displayed in Columns (7) and (8) of Table VII.…”
Section: Extended Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. MENA countries are the region where Islamic banks and conventional banks coexist. Islamic banks are divergent from conventional banks in terms of the source and use of funds (Ahmad and Luo, 2010; Miah and Sharmeen, 2015; Hassan and Aliyu, 2018; AlAbbad et al , 2019). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%