Abstract:Aims:The aim of this experimental study was to determine comparatively the removal of two types of bacteriophages, a somatic coliphage and an F-specific RNA phage and of three types of enteric viruses, hepatitis A virus (HAV), poliovirus and rotavirus during sewage treatment by activated sludge using laboratory pilot plants.
Methods and Results:The cultivable simian rotavirus SA11, the HAV HM 175/18f cytopathic strain and poliovirus were quantified by cell culture. The bacteriophages were quantified by plaque … Show more
“…Coliphage was suggested as a better indicator for human virus because it shares decay characteristics that are similar to those of human viruses (1,2,11,22). Several studies, including our own study of the southern California coast, showed a correlation between coliphage and PCR-detectable human viral genome (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The principle tributary of Newport Bay is San Diego Creek, which accounts for 122 square miles (316 km 2 ), or about 80%, of the Newport Bay watershed. Other drainage areas include the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, the Big Canyon Wash, and some additional small tributaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, viral contamination of recreational coastal water is of particular importance and is a rising public health concern. Fϩ coliphage was recently proposed by the U.S. EPA as a surrogate for human viral contamination in groundwater because some groups of Fϩ coliphage resemble human polioviruses and other enteric viruses in terms of survival and morphology (1)(2)(3)22). Fϩ coliphage are most prevalent in human sewage but may not be present in individual human feces.…”
Recent studies have shown that the fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) currently used to indicate water quality in the coastal environment may be inadequate to reflect human viral contamination. Coliphage was suggested as a better indicator of human viral pollution and was proposed by the U.S. EPA as an alternative indicator for fecal pollution in groundwater. In this study, we investigated the occurrence and distribution of FIB, F؉ coliphage, and PCRdetectable human adenovirus and enterovirus for an entire year at 15 locations around the Newport Bay watershed, an important southern California estuary for water recreation and an ecological reserve. Peak concentrations and prevalences of FIB and F؉ coliphage were associated with winter storms (wet weather). Human adenoviruses and enteroviruses, however, were detected by PCR in ϳ5% of samples collected in the summer (dry weather) but only once in wet weather. These results demonstrated that FIB and coliphage have similar seasonal and freshwater-tosaltwater distribution patterns, while the detection of human viruses depends on a distribution pattern that is the opposite of that of FIB and coliphage. This research suggested that coliphage and FIB share similar environmental sources, while sources of human viruses in Newport Bay are perhaps different.Coastal recreational water quality standards in California and throughout most of the world are based on the concentration of coliforms or Enterococcus spp., known as fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). However, the adequacy of current water quality standards to indicate the presence of human viral pathogens is still questionable. For example, Marino et al. (23) conducted a study of two Mediterranean bathing beaches, using WHO/UNEP and European Community bathing water directives as the microbial water quality guidelines. They concluded that neither set of guidelines was successful for protecting the public from health hazards related to fecal contamination of bathing water (23).
“…Coliphage was suggested as a better indicator for human virus because it shares decay characteristics that are similar to those of human viruses (1,2,11,22). Several studies, including our own study of the southern California coast, showed a correlation between coliphage and PCR-detectable human viral genome (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The principle tributary of Newport Bay is San Diego Creek, which accounts for 122 square miles (316 km 2 ), or about 80%, of the Newport Bay watershed. Other drainage areas include the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, the Big Canyon Wash, and some additional small tributaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, viral contamination of recreational coastal water is of particular importance and is a rising public health concern. Fϩ coliphage was recently proposed by the U.S. EPA as a surrogate for human viral contamination in groundwater because some groups of Fϩ coliphage resemble human polioviruses and other enteric viruses in terms of survival and morphology (1)(2)(3)22). Fϩ coliphage are most prevalent in human sewage but may not be present in individual human feces.…”
Recent studies have shown that the fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) currently used to indicate water quality in the coastal environment may be inadequate to reflect human viral contamination. Coliphage was suggested as a better indicator of human viral pollution and was proposed by the U.S. EPA as an alternative indicator for fecal pollution in groundwater. In this study, we investigated the occurrence and distribution of FIB, F؉ coliphage, and PCRdetectable human adenovirus and enterovirus for an entire year at 15 locations around the Newport Bay watershed, an important southern California estuary for water recreation and an ecological reserve. Peak concentrations and prevalences of FIB and F؉ coliphage were associated with winter storms (wet weather). Human adenoviruses and enteroviruses, however, were detected by PCR in ϳ5% of samples collected in the summer (dry weather) but only once in wet weather. These results demonstrated that FIB and coliphage have similar seasonal and freshwater-tosaltwater distribution patterns, while the detection of human viruses depends on a distribution pattern that is the opposite of that of FIB and coliphage. This research suggested that coliphage and FIB share similar environmental sources, while sources of human viruses in Newport Bay are perhaps different.Coastal recreational water quality standards in California and throughout most of the world are based on the concentration of coliforms or Enterococcus spp., known as fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). However, the adequacy of current water quality standards to indicate the presence of human viral pathogens is still questionable. For example, Marino et al. (23) conducted a study of two Mediterranean bathing beaches, using WHO/UNEP and European Community bathing water directives as the microbial water quality guidelines. They concluded that neither set of guidelines was successful for protecting the public from health hazards related to fecal contamination of bathing water (23).
The aim of this study was to assess the presence and seasonal frequency of various enteric viruses in wastewater treatment. The detection of astrovirus, norovirus, enterovirus, hepatitis A virus (HAV) and rotavirus was carried out by molecular analyses in concentrated water samples collected over 18 months at the entrance and exit of an activated sludge sewage treatment plant. The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were confirmed by sequencing, and comparative phylogenetic analysis was performed on the isolated strains. Genomes of human astrovirus and human rotavirus were identified in 26/29 and 11/29 samples of raw sewage, respectively, and in 12/29 and 13/29 treated effluent samples, respectively. Some rotavirus sequences detected in environmental samples were very close to those of clinical strains. Noroviruses, enteroviruses and HAV were not detected during the study period. This could be related to the small sample volume, to the sensitivity of the detection methods or to local epidemiological situations.Frequent detection of viral RNA, whether infectious or not, in the exit effluent of sewage treatment indicates wide dispersion of enteric viruses in the environment. Consequently, viral contamination resulting from the use of these treated waters is a risk that needs to be addressed.
“…A range of studies, performed at both pilot-scale and within full-scale municipal wastewater plants, have demonstrated that microbial removal in MBR systems is more effective than in conventional activated sludge treatment systems (Arraj et al, 2005;Ottoson et al, 2006;Francy et al, 2012;Marti et al, 2011). Further, MBR systems have been shown to remove microorganisms that are greater in size than the membrane filter pores.…”
The aim of this study was to assess the potential removal efficacy of enteric viruses in a fullscale membrane bioreactor (MBR) wastewater reuse system, using a range of indigenous and 'spiked' bacteriophages (phages) of known size and morphology. Samples were taken each week for three months from nine locations at each treatment stage of the water recycling plant (WRP) and tested for a range of microbiological parameters (n=135). Mean levels of faecal coliforms were reduced to 0.3 CFU/ 100ml in the MBR product and were undetected in samples taken after the chlorination stage. A relatively large reduction (5.3 log) in somatic coliphages was also observed following MBR treatment. However, F-RNA and humanspecific (GB124) phages were less abundant at all stages, and demonstrated log reductions post-MBR of 3.5 and 3.8, respectively. In 'spiking' experiments, free-swimming 'spiked' phages (MS2 and B14) displayed post-MBR log reductions of 2.25 and 2.30, respectively.The removal of these 'free-swimming' phages, which are smaller than the membrane pore size (0.04 µm), also highlights the possible role of the membrane biofilm as an effective additional barrier to virus transmission. The findings from this study of a full-scale MBR
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.