2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-7065(02)00005-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of atmospheric parameters derived from GPS, VLBI and a ground-based microwave radiometer in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 represents the differences in PWV measurement between the two equipments in time series, the average is 1.1 mm and the standard deviation is represented as 1.2 mm. This is a result similar to average value of 0.5 mm and standard deviation of 1.4 mm for differences between two equipments measured by Pacione et al (2002), respectively. In summer when there is a large amount of water vapor in the atmosphere and the range of temporal variation of PWV is large, the average value of differences between two equipments is represented as 1.9 mm, and the standard deviation is represented as 1.4 mm while the temperature (Rose & Czekala 2009).…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Pwvsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 represents the differences in PWV measurement between the two equipments in time series, the average is 1.1 mm and the standard deviation is represented as 1.2 mm. This is a result similar to average value of 0.5 mm and standard deviation of 1.4 mm for differences between two equipments measured by Pacione et al (2002), respectively. In summer when there is a large amount of water vapor in the atmosphere and the range of temporal variation of PWV is large, the average value of differences between two equipments is represented as 1.9 mm, and the standard deviation is represented as 1.4 mm while the temperature (Rose & Czekala 2009).…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Pwvsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The observation values of radiosonde which has been used for the longest period of time are used often for verification, calibration and analysis of characteristics for values measured by other systems. For example, in a relative comparison with values measured by MWR, average difference from radiosonde results was represented as 1-5 mm, and standard deviation was represented as 1-2 mm (Westwater et al 1989, Liou et al 2001, Basili et al 2002, Pacione et al 2002, and in a relative comparison with values measured by GPS, average difference from radiosonde results was represented as 1-4 mm, and standard deviation was represented as 1-5 mm (Moon et al 1999, Kwon et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pacione et al, 2002;Rózsa, 2014) or by combining the uncertainties of the input variables used in order to obtain the uncertainty of the GNSS IWV (e.g. Wang et al, 2007;Ning et al (2013);and Van Malderen et al, 2014).…”
Section: T Ning Et Al: the Uncertainty Of The Gnss-derived Iwvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque la componente hidrostática tiene un mayor efecto en el retraso troposférico, su valor es muy estable, pudiendo ser estimado a partir de medidas de presión atmosférica en superficie, lo que facilita su cálculo mediante modelos, como por ejemplo el modelo de Saastamoinen, con una precisión mejor de 1% (Roberts y Rizos, 2001; Pacione et al, 2002). Las pequeñas variaciones que se producen en los valores del ZHD son proporcionales a los cambios de la presión en superficie debidos a su vez a las variaciones locales atmosféricas.…”
Section: Estimación Del Contenido De Vapor De Agua Atmosférico Con Téunclassified