2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Assessment of Native Coronary Arteries by Standard Versus Three-Dimensional Coronary Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 mm error in lengths of 40 mm and higher in both studies). Another study using similar methodology (a marker wire as a benchmark for intracoronary length measurements) showed very similar precision in quantitative evaluation of coronary anatomy as our present study [9]. However, 3D reconstructions in that study were generated from rotational angiography.…”
Section: Analityków (Zmienność Pomiędzy Obserwatorami) Wykres Ilustrsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 mm error in lengths of 40 mm and higher in both studies). Another study using similar methodology (a marker wire as a benchmark for intracoronary length measurements) showed very similar precision in quantitative evaluation of coronary anatomy as our present study [9]. However, 3D reconstructions in that study were generated from rotational angiography.…”
Section: Analityków (Zmienność Pomiędzy Obserwatorami) Wykres Ilustrsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…more precise stent selection, tackling chronic total occlusions, remote or robotic guidance of PCI). But only recently have the advances in computer power made simple and fast 3-dimensional rendering of angiographic images possible [6][7][8][9][10]. Three-dimensional angiography proved useful in assessment of one of the most complex interventional challenges, left main coronary anatomy [20].…”
Section: Analityków (Zmienność Pomiędzy Obserwatorami) Wykres Ilustrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure is generally known as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). With the development of 3D coronary artery reconstruction algorithms, QCA can now performed in 3D reconstruction of the lesion of interest (Figure 2) (Dvir et al, 2008;Garcia et al, 2007), which is shown to be in an agreement with ground truth measurements via guidewire or IVUS measurements (Agostoni et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2012;Meerkin et al, 2010;Neubauer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Necessity and Potential Uses Of Coronary Artery Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Once the image is created, operators can manipulate the images by zooming in or rotating the image. This allows the operator to have a better understanding of coronary anatomy and could also help the operator find an optimal angle to image of a vessel for an intervention (Dvir et al, 2005;Agostoni et al, 2008). An example of coronary after reconstructed with CardiOp-B system is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Qcamentioning
confidence: 99%