Statistical shape modeling is a powerful tool for visualizing and quantifying geometric and functional patterns of the heart. After myocardial infarction (MI), the left ventricle typically remodels in response to physiological challenges. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to describe statistical shape changes. Which method best characterizes left ventricular remodeling after MI is an open research question. A better descriptor of remodeling is expected to provide a more accurate evaluation of disease status in MI patients. We therefore designed a challenge to test shape characterization in MI given a set of three-dimensional left ventricular surface points. The training set comprised 100 MI patients, and 100 asymptomatic volunteers (AV). The challenge was initiated in 2015 at the Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart workshop, in conjunction with the MICCAI conference. The training set with labels was provided to participants, who were asked to submit the likelihood of MI from a different (validation) set of 200 cases (100 AV and 100 MI). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used as the outcome measures. The goals of this challenge were to (1) establish a common dataset for evaluating statistical shape modeling algorithms in MI, and (2) test whether statistical shape modeling provides additional information characterizing MI patients over standard clinical measures. Eleven groups with a wide variety of classification and feature extraction approaches participated in this challenge. All methods achieved excellent classification results with accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.98. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were all above 0.90. Four methods showed significantly higher performance than standard clinical measures. The dataset and software for evaluation are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project website1.

Despite continuous progress in X-ray angiography systems, X-ray coronary angiography is fundamentally limited by its 2D representation of moving coronary arterial trees, which can negatively impact assessment of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention. To provide clinicians with 3D/3D+time information of coronary arteries, methods computing reconstructions of coronary arteries from X-ray angiography are required. Because of several aspects (e.g. cardiac and respiratory motion, type of X-ray system), reconstruction from X-ray coronary angiography has led to vast amount of research and it still remains as a challenging and dynamic research area. In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art approaches on reconstruction of high-contrast coronary arteries from X-ray angiography. We mainly focus on the theoretical features in model-based (modelling) and tomographic reconstruction of coronary arteries, and discuss the evaluation strategies. We also discuss the potential role of reconstructions in clinical decision making and interventional guidance, and highlight areas for future research.

No abstract

To evaluate deep-learning based calcium quantification on Chest CT scans compared with manual evaluation, and to enable interpretation in terms of the traditional Agatston score on dedicated Cardiac CT. Methods: Automated calcium quantification was performed using a combination of deep-learning convolution neural networks with a ResNet-architecture for image features and a fully connected neural network for spatial coordinate features. Calcifications were identified automatically, after which the algorithm automatically excluded all non-coronary calcifications using coronary probability maps and aortic segmentation. The algorithm was first trained on cardiac-CTs and refined on non-triggered chest-CTs. This study used on 95 patients (cohort 1), who underwent both dedicated calcium scoring and chest-CT acquisitions using the Agatston score as reference standard and 168 patients (cohort 2) who underwent chest-CT only using qualitative expert assessment for external validation. Results from the deep-learning model were compared to Agatston-scores(cardiac-CTs) and manually determined calcium volumes(chest-CTs) and risk classifications. Results: In cohort 1, the Agatston score and AI determined calcium volume shows high correlation with a correlation coefficient of 0.921(p < 0.001) and R 2 of 0.91. According to the Agatston categories, a total of 67(70 %) were correctly classified with a sensitivity of 91 % and specificity of 92 % in detecting presence of coronary calcifications. Manual determined calcium volume on chest-CT showed excellent correlation with the AI volumes with a correlation coefficient of 0.923(p < 0.001) and R 2 of 0.96, no significant difference was found (p = 0.247). According to qualitative risk classifications in cohort 2, 138(82 %) cases were correctly classified with a k-coefficient of 0.74, representing good agreement. All wrongly classified scans (30(18 %)) were attributed to an adjacent category. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence based calcium quantification on chest-CTs shows good correlation compared to reference standards. Fully automating this process may reduce evaluation time and potentially optimize clinical calcium scoring without additional acquisitions.

A probabilistic group-wise similarity registration technique based on Student's t-mixture model (TMM) and a multi-resolution extension of the same (mr-TMM) are proposed in this study, to robustly align shapes and establish valid correspondences, for the purpose of training statistical shape models (SSMs). Shape analysis across large cohorts requires automatic generation of the requisite training sets. Automated segmentation and landmarking of medical images often result in shapes with varying proportions of outliers and consequently require a robust method of alignment and correspondence estimation. Both TMM and mrTMM are validated by comparison with state-of-the-art registration algorithms based on Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), using both synthetic and clinical data. Four clinical data sets are used for validation: (a) 2D femoral heads (K= 1000 samples generated from DXA images of healthy subjects); (b) control-hippocampi (K= 50 samples generated from T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of healthy subjects); (c) MCI-hippocampi (K= 28 samples generated from MR images of patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment); and (d) heart shapes comprising left and right ventricular endocardium and epicardium (K= 30 samples generated from short-axis MR images of: 10 healthy subjects, 10 patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension and 10 diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The proposed methods significantly outperformed the state-of-the-art in terms of registration accuracy in the experiments involving synthetic data, with mrTMM offering significant improvement over TMM. With the clinical data, both methods performed comparably to the state-of-the-art for the hippocampi and heart data sets, which contained few outliers. They outperformed the state-of-the-art for the femur data set, containing large proportions of outliers, in terms of alignment accuracy, and the quality of SSMs trained, quantified in terms of generalization, compactness and specificity.