2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations

Abstract: Our results suggest that, when treating Israeli patients, one should expect to use the preformed ovoid arch form orthodontic wires in a significant percentage of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
24
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously published 13.1 (4.1e23.6) 12.6 (4.1e23.6) 14.7 (7.3e23.6) 12.9 (7.1e19.8) Concavity depth (mm) 3.7 (0.7e10.1) Concavity angle ( ) 53.9 (22.0e75.8) (Chan et al, 2011a;Watanabe et al, 2010). Variations of the facial morphology between different ethnic groups have been described in various studies (Bayome et al, 2011;Gafni et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2013). In the canine and first premolar region, a lingual undercut was found only in 14.4% of all cross-sections analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A previously published 13.1 (4.1e23.6) 12.6 (4.1e23.6) 14.7 (7.3e23.6) 12.9 (7.1e19.8) Concavity depth (mm) 3.7 (0.7e10.1) Concavity angle ( ) 53.9 (22.0e75.8) (Chan et al, 2011a;Watanabe et al, 2010). Variations of the facial morphology between different ethnic groups have been described in various studies (Bayome et al, 2011;Gafni et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2013). In the canine and first premolar region, a lingual undercut was found only in 14.4% of all cross-sections analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that the most common arch form is tapered in Caucasians (43.8%), square in Korean and Japanese people (46.7% and 45.6%, respectively), and ovoid in Israeli people (50.7%) 8,9,15. Meanwhile, Bayome et al12 reported an even distribution of the arch forms in Egyptians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Dental arch dimensions differ with age, gender and ethnicity, so ideally future studies should investigate dental anatomy, alignment of the teeth and the presence of undercuts as possible influencing factors on MG retention. This study did not consider the effect of anatomical differences within the dental arches as only one master cast with no irregular teeth was examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a MG is poorly fitted and not retentive, an athlete will try to keep it in position, which could cause distraction, speech and breathing impedances; consequently having a negative effect on performance. In addition, Del Rossi et al 7 suggested that MGs with better fit might limit the clenching forces naturally applied by an individual to keep a loose MG in position, thereby prolonging the life of the device.Dental arch dimensions differ with age, gender and ethnicity,[23][24][25] so ideally future studies should investigate dental anatomy, alignment of the teeth and the presence of undercuts as possible influencing factors on MG retention. This study did not consider the effect of anatomical differences within the dental arches as only one master cast with no irregular teeth was examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%