Effect of mouthguard design on retention and potential issues arising with usability in sport

Abstract

Background/Aims Mouthguard retention could potentially increase an athlete's motivation to wear the device, due to potential improvements in physical comfort. The aim of this study was to examine the retentive properties of selected customised mouthguard designs, during normal conditions (dry) and within the presence of artificial saliva (wet). Additionally, the correlation between thickness and retention was investigated. Material and Methods Six different custom mouthguard designs (MG1‐MG6) reported in previous studies, were pressure‐formed with 2 and 4 mm blanks accordingly. Thickness was measured 10 times at seven anatomical points and the mean (±SD) was recorded. A novel rig was fabricated to connect the mouthguards to a Hounsfield H10KS Tensometer, which was used to fully displace each device from the model at a constant rate of 50 mm/min. The test was repeated under both dry and wet conditions. Results Retention forces recorded at the anterior region demonstrated higher measurements under wet conditions than dry (P < 0.001). The total retention of the mouthguards was influenced by alterations in their design. Trend analysis indicated that 64% of MG retention could be explained by their thickness under dry conditions and 55% when wet. Conclusions Design and thickness of mouthguards are key factors in retention. Mouthguard fabrication techniques should be considered in order to minimize dislodgment of the devices as well as potentially increasing the wearability of mouthguards during sport.

Effect of thickness and occlusal accommodation on the degree of satisfaction with mouthguard use among water polo players: A randomized crossover trial

“…33 In most water polo players, the limited perceived benefit offered by anterior contact might be insufficient to counteract the greater discomfort due to increased mouthguard thickness. Although in vitro data show that mouthguards have better retention as they become thicker, 34 players in this study reported no differences between the conventional and occlusal-accommodated mouthguards. Therefore, the conventional custom-made mouthguard appears to offer a good balance between sufficient retention and tolerance.…”

The prevalence of orofacial injuries in judo: A cross‐sectional study

“…Several studies have also shown that the attitude towards mouthguards evolves after the experience of a dental trauma . Design and thickness are key factors for the wearability of mouthguards . Aesthetic considerations are due to subjective awareness, but poor retention and breathing problems can be addressed with a custom‐made mouthguard …”

Present Status in Polymeric Mouthguards. A Future Area for Additive Manufacturing?

“…The protectors inside the mouth must be aligned with the upper jaw. Therefore, a proper fit and high local retention throughout the physical activity constitute the design challenges to consider for the device to remain in the same position during the sports practice [20]. It is also noteworthy that the thickness through the length of the device may affect the final retention, comfort, and capacity of protection [21].…”