2013
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e31827786bc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Anterolateral Thigh, Lateral Arm, and Parascapular Free Flaps with Regard to Donor-Site Morbidity and Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes

Abstract: In terms of reducing donor-site morbidity, the parascapular flap represents a valuable alternative to the anterolateral thigh and lateral arm flaps, but side positioning and increased seroma are drawbacks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale has been validated in several studies. 5,8,11 There are few prospective studies regarding the effect of RFF flap reconstruction on function. When preoperative and postoperative forearms were compared with nonoperated forearms, there were statistically significant differences in wrist flexion, pinch strength and sensation, but no subjective complaints of loss of function by any patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scale has been validated in several studies. 5,8,11 There are few prospective studies regarding the effect of RFF flap reconstruction on function. When preoperative and postoperative forearms were compared with nonoperated forearms, there were statistically significant differences in wrist flexion, pinch strength and sensation, but no subjective complaints of loss of function by any patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFF flaps have been found to have widely varying effects on hand function, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] but studies of their effect on upper extremity function are few and have failed to take into consideration the possible effect of neck dissection. 4,5,8,9 The aim of the present prospective matched-pair study was to determine the effect of the RFF flap on upper extremity function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 demostraron que el colgajo paraescapular era fiable por la facilidad para su elevaci贸n y su anatom铆a vascular confiable; [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] se ha demostrado que el ped铆culo vascular del colgajo paraescapular es m谩s constante que el del colgajo anterolateral del muslo. 20,[27][28][29][30] En los 20 colgajos paraescapulares evaluados en esta serie, no se observaron anomal铆as vasculares durante la disecci贸n del ped铆culo y, sobre la base de reportes previos, no se realiz贸 una evaluaci贸n preoperatoria para confirmar su presencia. La longitud total efectiva del ped铆culo del colgajo paraescapular promedio es de 11 a 14 cm, 20 pero puede prolongarse si la disecci贸n se extiende a la arteria angular de la esc谩pula.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El colgajo paraescapular se caracteriza por presentar una baja tasa de complicaciones en el sitio donante. 7,30,39 Roll y cols., 39 en su serie de colgajos paraescapulares, no observaron complicaciones mayores, como seroma, infecci贸n o dehiscencia de la herida, solo registraron retraso en la curaci贸n de la herida en dos casos. Klinkenberg y cols.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation