2018 22nd International Microwave and Radar Conference (MIKON) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/mikon.2018.8405202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of angular spread for 6 and 60 GHz based on 3GPP standard

Abstract: In an urban environment, a multipath propagation is one of the basic phenomena affecting a quality of received signals. This causes dispersions in time and angular domains. Basic parameters describing these dispersions are the rms delay spread and rms angle spread, respectively. The delay spread is related to a frequency of the transmitted signal and the nature of the propagation environment. In this paper, we show a mutual relationship between the time and angular dispersions in the received signal. The obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the angular spread values at D-band frequencies for indoor environments, with distances up to 10 m, reported in [24]. These results confirm the lower angular spread at mmWave frequencies compared to lower frequencies, which was also reported in [25]. The angular spread at mmWave frequencies is higher than at THz frequencies.…”
Section: A Line-of-sight and Non-line-of-sight Path Loss Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in line with the angular spread values at D-band frequencies for indoor environments, with distances up to 10 m, reported in [24]. These results confirm the lower angular spread at mmWave frequencies compared to lower frequencies, which was also reported in [25]. The angular spread at mmWave frequencies is higher than at THz frequencies.…”
Section: A Line-of-sight and Non-line-of-sight Path Loss Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Outdoor channel models up to 18 GHz show that delay spread decreases and Ricean K-factor increases with frequency (Kristem et al, 2018). Similar to indoor environments, statistical outdoor radio channels at 60 GHz (Kelner et al, 2018) show that a lower angular dispersion is observed. In Aslam et al (2020), outdoor channel measurements are performed along a street canyon, with antennas mounted at a height of 3 m, and compared to ray-tracing simulations, confirming the channel sparsity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Outdoor channel models up to 18 GHz show that delay spread decreases and Ricean K‐factor increases with frequency (Kristem et al., 2018). Similar to indoor environments, statistical outdoor radio channels at 60 GHz (Kelner et al., 2018) show that a lower angular dispersion is observed. In Aslam et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…10. In [27], for 6 and 60 GHz, the influence of the directions, αT and αR, of the transmitting and receiving antenna, respectively, on ASs at the reception point and receiving antenna output is analyzed. The obtained results show a significant influence of the directional receiving antennas on the reduction of the angular dispersion in the received signal.…”
Section: Assessment Of Angle Spread For Different Propagation Environ...mentioning
confidence: 99%