1984
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.2.181-184.1984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of an indirect fluorescent-antibody test with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serological studies of Lyme disease

Abstract: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was compared with an indirect fluorescent antibody test for its ability to detect antibodies to the Lyme disease spirochete in sera of naturally infected humans, dogs, and whitefooted mice and experimentally infected Swiss mice. Ninety-five percent of the total 123 sera analyzed reacted similarly in both tests. For 36 human sera, the correlation coefficient (r = 0.47) for logarithmic transformations of indirect fluorescent antibody and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the ELISA has a number of advantages for serodiagnosis, including sensitivity and ease of automation (5,6,9). The reactions of positive and negative samples were similar in both IFA and ELISA for the survey of the antibody in various mammalian species (9). We also comfirmed that the titers of IFA were correlated with those of ELISA for serum samples from humans (correlation coefficient r>0.88, statistical significant P<0.01, 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the ELISA has a number of advantages for serodiagnosis, including sensitivity and ease of automation (5,6,9). The reactions of positive and negative samples were similar in both IFA and ELISA for the survey of the antibody in various mammalian species (9). We also comfirmed that the titers of IFA were correlated with those of ELISA for serum samples from humans (correlation coefficient r>0.88, statistical significant P<0.01, 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In general, it is important for the prevention of the disease to know the facts of transmission of B. burgdorferi by the ticks to wild animals and to clarify the reservoirs of Lyme borreliosis. For the survey of Lyme disease, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test and ELISA have been developed to detect antibodies to B. burgdorferi (9,16). In particular, the ELISA has a number of advantages for serodiagnosis, including sensitivity and ease of automation (5,6,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All protein and IgG concentrations were determined by lasernephelometry (Behring Laser Nephelometer, B ehring-Werke, Marburg, FRG) and expressed in milligrams per decilitre (rag/ dl). Antibodies to B. burgdorferi were tested by IFT and ELISA as described previously [13]. The IgG coefficient was calculated according to the method of Delpech and Lichtblau [5].…”
Section: Determination Of Csf and Serum Protein Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four strains, B. afzelii strain PGau from cerebrospinal fluid from a Lyme disease patient in Germany, B. garinii strain HPI isolated from I. persulcatus in Hokkaido, Japan, B. valaisiana strain KRI from a wild rodent, Rattus losea captured in Kinmen island and B. valaisiana strain TMI isolated from a wild rodent, Mus formosanus captured in Taichung (11), were used as antigens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Preparation of antigen and ELISA were performed according to the method described by Magnarelli et al (9). Affinity-purified horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-Iabeled goat anti-mouse IgG-IgM-IgA serum (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratory, Md., U.S.A) diluted to 1:I,000 was used as a second antibody.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%