2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of amperometric biosensors fabricated by palladium sputtering, palladium electrodeposition and Nafion/carbon nanotube casting on screen-printed carbon electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercially available meters that apply the SPCE technique have CVs in the range of 3%-6% (21-23 ). The imprecision of glucose meter measurements has been attributed to inconsistency in the electrochemical response area (11 ). In the present study, efficient control of the electrochemical area seemed to effectively improve the imprecision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Commercially available meters that apply the SPCE technique have CVs in the range of 3%-6% (21-23 ). The imprecision of glucose meter measurements has been attributed to inconsistency in the electrochemical response area (11 ). In the present study, efficient control of the electrochemical area seemed to effectively improve the imprecision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the present study, efficient control of the electrochemical area seemed to effectively improve the imprecision. Additionally, gold electrodeposition during electrode manufacturing has better precision than the sputtering process because of the former's electrochemical reproducibility (11 ). We suggest that the superior precision of the GM310 may be attributed to its simplified fabrication technique (24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scanning of an ion beam across the substrate is similar to scanning electron microscopy, and the removal of material occurs in a manner similar to removal of material from the metal target during the sputtering process. [143][144][145] Focused ion beam micromachining and focused electron beam micromachining should not be confused with e-beam lithography (Section 1.4.1). In the case of focused ion beam and focused electron beam micromachining, the use of a photoresist and the additional process steps of development and stripping are not required.…”
Section: Submicron Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%