2012
DOI: 10.1108/00021461211222132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of alternative sources of farmland values

Abstract: Purpose -Consistent and reliable data on farmland values is critical to assessing the overall financial health of agricultural producers. However, little is known about the idiosyncrasies and similarities of standard land value data sources -US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Federal Reserve Bank land value surveys, and transaction prices. The purpose of this paper is to determine the differences and similarities of land value movements from three land value data sources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation is highest between the Federal Reserve and the USDA survey data, at 94 percent. This supports the previous findings for the state of Oklahoma provided by Zakrzewicz et al (2012). The correlation between the Federal Reserve and ISU (82 percent) and the USDA and ISU (76 percent) are much lower, yet the correlation is still significant and large.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The correlation is highest between the Federal Reserve and the USDA survey data, at 94 percent. This supports the previous findings for the state of Oklahoma provided by Zakrzewicz et al (2012). The correlation between the Federal Reserve and ISU (82 percent) and the USDA and ISU (76 percent) are much lower, yet the correlation is still significant and large.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Instead, the Federal Reserve provides average percentage changes from the previous quarter derived from the aggregate point estimates. Prior studies demonstrate that these percentage changes and point estimates are consistent with market transaction prices (Zakrzewicz, Brorsen, and Briggeman, 2012), as well as aggregate farmland values reported by similar, annual surveys of farmers and other farmland market experts (Kuethe and Ifft, 2013).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition to farmland price expectations, the survey asks respondents to provide a point estimate of the average value for “good quality” farmland in their area. Because the Federal Reserve is a regulatory agency, it does not publish the survey's point estimates to prevent the information from being used as a benchmark for farmland sales (Zakrzewicz, Brorsen, and Briggeman, 2012). Instead, the Federal Reserve provides average percentage changes from the previous quarter derived from the aggregate point estimates.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Farmer-reported land values have been used in studies of the impacts of government policies on the value of farmland (e.g., Goodwin, Mishra, andOrtalo-Magné 2003, Towe andTra 2013). The farmland value data used in this study are also used to inform USDA farmland value estimates, which have been shown to be highly correlated with transaction values (Zakrzewicz, Brorsen, and Briggeman 2012). The survey uses an area frame sampling methodology in which "segments" that are approximately one square mile in size are randomly sampled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%