2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of AC and DC constant photocurrent methods for determination of defect densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomena observed in a-Si:H thin film CPM and FTPS spectra are in good agreement with [7] where results of DC and AC CPM (measured at various chopping frequencies) are compared and differences explained on the basis of theoretical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The phenomena observed in a-Si:H thin film CPM and FTPS spectra are in good agreement with [7] where results of DC and AC CPM (measured at various chopping frequencies) are compared and differences explained on the basis of theoretical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…53 The application of both CPM and PDS for evaluation of the defect density is established for a-Si: H. Methods to identify the contribution from the defects on the absorption spectra have been investigated and described in detail in the literature. 52,53,[92][93][94][95][96] For c-Si: H the relation between defect absorption measured with PDS and spin density was recently investigated. 62 It was seen that an almost linear relationship between the defect absorption and N s exists over 3 orders of magnitude, but there are also considerable deviations from this behavior which makes use of PDS for optimization difficult.…”
Section: E Photoconductivity and Defects In C-si: H Doped With Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that CPM spectra may be influenced by transport and recombination processes. Discrepancies between the absorption spectrum in some of a-Si:H films obtained by DC and AC CPM have been noted by several groups [10][11][12]. The discrepancy is in the 'defect' region of the spectrum, at photon energies below 1.4 eV with the DC technique consistently giving a higher value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%