Comparison of a video questionnaire* with the IUATLD written questionnaire for measuring asthma prevalence

Shaw, R A; Crane, Julian; Pearce, Neil; Burgess, Carl; Bremner, Peter; Woodman, Kate; Beasley, Richard

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00166.x

Cited by 106 publications

(81 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both written and video symptom questions from the ISAAC survey were used [12][13][14][15][16]. The 12-14 yr age group was chosen to reflect the period when morbidity from asthma is common and to enable the use of self-completed questionnaires.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health consequences associated with frequent wheezing in adolescents without asthma diagnosis

Yeatts

Davis

Peden³

et al. 2003

Eur Respir J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using questions from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood, this study evaluated the association between undiagnosed frequent wheezing and health consequences in adolescents.The North Carolina School Asthma Survey provided self-reported questionnaire data on respiratory health from 122,829 children aged 12-14 yrs. The frequency of health consequences were compared among undiagnosed frequent wheezers, diagnosed asthmatics, and children with no wheezing symptoms or diagnosed asthma.The odds of wheezing-related sleep disturbances, limited activities, and missed school were higher among undiagnosed frequent wheezers, relative to diagnosed asthmatics. The frequency of emergency room visits and hospitalisations did not differ substantially between the undiagnosed wheezing and diagnosed asthma groups, though the undiagnosed group was less likely to have visited a physician for wheezing in the past year.Children with frequent wheezing symptoms but no asthma diagnosis experience substantial illness-related morbidity similar to that of diagnosed asthmatics. Undiagnosed frequent wheezers require more recognition from primary care physicians and need active disease management to reduce health consequences. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: 781-786.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health consequences associated with frequent wheezing in adolescents without asthma diagnosis

Yeatts

Davis

Peden³

et al. 2003

Eur Respir J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• The Childhood Asthma Questionnaire was developed based on literature review, a Delphi approach, and a synthesis of question items previously tested and shown to be predictive [36][37][38][39].…”

Section: Case-finding Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) Guidelines: Integrating diagnostic guidelines for managing chronic respiratory diseases in primary care

Halbert

Isonaka²

2006

Primary Care Respiratory Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This is the first of the IPCRG Guideline papers. The IPCRG took on the task of producing an integrated guideline for the management of chronic respiratory diseases in primary care. This included some original work aimed at developing questionnaires suitable for improving the diagnosis and recognition of respiratory diseases in the primary care setting. This paper provides the background evidence and rationale for the integrated diagnostic section of the IPCRG Guideline. It focusses on identifying the unique challenges in respiratory disease diagnosis in primary care, the use of epidemiology to build a co-ordinated diagnostic framework, and the development of tools to support guideline implementation.

show abstract

“…Son zamanlarda video anket yönteminin de kullanımı artmaktadır. Video anket yöntemi ile yapılan çalışmalarda yazılı anket yöntemiyle yapılan çalışmalara göre ailelerin vizingi daha iyi tanımladıkları, terminolojiden kaynaklı kısıtlamaların daha az olduğu ve video anket yöntemi ile yapılan çalışmalarda vizing prevalansının daha düşük olduğu saptanmıştır (8)(9)(10).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Vizing Sesinin Halk Tarafından Tanımlanması

Güngör¹,

Güngör²,

Atar³

et al. 2018

Asthma Allergy Immunol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZAmaç: Vizing İngilizce kökenli bir kelimedir ve İngilizcenin anadil olmadığı ülkelerde aileler yakınmalarını farklı terminolojiler kullanarak anlatırlar. Bu anlatım farklılığı tanıda zorluklar yaşanmasına yol açabilmektedir. Çalışmada, halkın vizing sesini nasıl tarif ettiği saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: ISAAC (International Study of Asthma andAllergies in Childhood) çalışma grubu tarafından video anket yöntemi için hazırlanan görüntü akıllı telefonlar yardımıyla gönüllü kişilere izletildi. İlk aşamada gönüllülerden izledikleri görüntüdeki sesi tarif etmeleri istendi, ikinci aşamada ise daha önceden belirlenmiş olan seçenekler verilerek bu sese en yakın tanımın hangisi olduğu soruldu. Kişilerin tanımlayıcı bilgileri ve sosyoekonomik durumları kaydedildi.Bulgular: Çalışmaya ortalama yaşı 36.1±9.4 yıl olan 322 gönüllü katıldı. Katılımcıların %52.2'si erkek idi ve %66.1'i videoda dinletilen sesi daha önce duymuştu. 322 katılımcının vizing sesi için 55 farklı tarif kullandığı saptandı. En çok kullanılan tarifler nefes darlığı sesi (%23.2), hırıltı (%15.8), boğulma sesi (%11.1) ve astımlı hasta kriz sesi (%9.3) idi. Hışıltı tüm cevapların %1.2'sini oluşturmaktaydı. Katılımcıların cinsiyetine ve ailelerinde allerjik hastalık öyküsü olup olmamasına göre vizing sesine verdikleri cevaplar arasında anlamlı farklılık saptandı (sırası ile p=0.005 ve p<0.001). Çalışmanın son kısmında katılımcılara daha önce hazırlanmış olan anketten seçenekler verilerek (hırıltı, hışıltı, kedi miyavlaması, fokurtu, haşırtı) dinledikleri sese en yakın ifadenin hangisi olduğu sorulduğunda en çok verilen 3 cevabın hırıltı, hışıltı ve kedi miyavlaması olduğu görüldü. ABSTRACTObjective: Wheezing is a word derived from English. However, the parents use different terminologies for the respiratory complaints of their children especially in countries where English is not a mother tongue. This expression variety can lead to difficulties in diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine how people describe the sound of wheezing. Materials and Methods:The video, prepared for the video questionnaire method by the ISAAC study group (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood), was watched by volunteers with the help of smartphones. In the first stage, they were asked to describe the voice in the video they watched. In the second stage they were given options and asked which is the closest description for the sound they heard. The descriptive information and socioeconomic status of the volunteers were recorded.Results: 322 volunteers with a mean age of 36.1 ± 9.4 years participated in this study. 52.2% of the participants were male. 66.1% of the participants had heard the voice played on the video before. It was determined that 322 participants used 55 different definitions for the wheezing sound. The most frequently used definitions were shortness of breath (23.2%), grunting (15.8%), choking sound (11.1%) and asthma patient crisis noise (9.3%). The wheezing accounted for 1.2% of all answers. Significant differences were found...

show abstract

Comparison of a video questionnaire* with the IUATLD written questionnaire for measuring asthma prevalence

Cited by 106 publications

References 22 publications

Health consequences associated with frequent wheezing in adolescents without asthma diagnosis

Health consequences associated with frequent wheezing in adolescents without asthma diagnosis

International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) Guidelines: Integrating diagnostic guidelines for managing chronic respiratory diseases in primary care

Vizing Sesinin Halk Tarafından Tanımlanması

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About