2009
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a modern broiler line and a heritage line unselected since the 1950s

Abstract: Selecting chicken for improved meat production has altered the relative growth of organs in modern broiler lines compared with heritage lines. In this study, we compared the growth and feed efficiency of a heritage line, UIUC, with a modern production line, Ross 708, for 5 wk posthatch. During this period, the BW and feed efficiency of the modern strain was higher than that of the heritage line, indicating that the Ross 708 birds were more efficient than the UIUC birds at converting feed to body mass. The rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
148
4
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
24
148
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensive selection pressures placed on broiler performance traits, such as increased body weight and growth rate, have resulted in broilers with an increased appetite and therefore also increased voluntary feed intake per day (Siegel and Wisman 1966;Pym and Nicholls 1979;Havenstein et al 1994aHavenstein et al , 2003bO'Sullivan et al 1992b;Schmidt et al 2009;Howie 2010Howie , 2011) (see also section 5). As well as genetic selection, exogenous factors which influence many physiological and behavioural processes can be carefully controlled to increase feed intake and pre-ingestion efficiency.…”
Section: Feed Intake Digestion and Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intensive selection pressures placed on broiler performance traits, such as increased body weight and growth rate, have resulted in broilers with an increased appetite and therefore also increased voluntary feed intake per day (Siegel and Wisman 1966;Pym and Nicholls 1979;Havenstein et al 1994aHavenstein et al , 2003bO'Sullivan et al 1992b;Schmidt et al 2009;Howie 2010Howie , 2011) (see also section 5). As well as genetic selection, exogenous factors which influence many physiological and behavioural processes can be carefully controlled to increase feed intake and pre-ingestion efficiency.…”
Section: Feed Intake Digestion and Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modern breed has been shown to be significantly heavier at every age with a significantly increased proportion of breast meat upon reaching slaughter than an old-type breed (Mussini 2012); Schmidt et al (2009) showed that the growth rate of breast meat has increased twice as fast as the overall body growth rate. Further, in an old-type breed, the breast muscle plateaued at 9 % of the body mass at day 14.…”
Section: Growth and Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hybridization allowed the achievement of further genetic improvement by additionally exploiting nonadditive genetic effects, and, consequently, nowadays, broilers are the outcome of pyramidal-structured crossbreeding programmes, whereas in the top tier a few dozen purebred great-grandparental lines are selected for a broad range of traits (Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven et al, 2013). Since the early days of poultry breeding, remarkable successes in economically important traits -such as growth rate, breast meat yield and feed efficiency -have been realized, as impressively demonstrated by Havenstein et al (2003) and Schmidt et al (2009), who compared growth performance and carcass composition of modern broilers to lines that remained unselected since the 1950s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth rate, breast meat yield (BMY) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)) of broilers and by adapting their diets according to their improved genetic potential. Genetic selection for these traits has been shown to be very effective, as demonstrated by Schmidt et al (2009) who showed that a modern broiler line grew 1.8 times faster, had 72% greater BW and two-fold higher BMY at 5 weeks than a heritage line. In the same time, such selection has induced changes in breast muscle characteristics such as increased fiber size (Guernec et al, 2003;Felicio et al, 2013;Koomkrong et al, 2015), and reduced glycolytic potential resulting in a higher ultimate pH (pHu) (Berri et al, 2001 and2007;Le Bihan-Duval et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%