Breeding programmes described as community-based (CBBP) typically relate to low-input systems with farmers having a common interest to improve and share their genetic resources. CBBPs are more frequent with keepers of small ruminants, in particular smallholders of local breeds, than with cattle, pigs or chickens with which farmers may have easier access to alternative programmes. Constraints that limit the adoption of conventional breeding technologies in low-input systems cover a range of organizational and technical aspects. The analysis of 8 CBBPs located in countries of Latin-America, Africa and Asia highlights the importance of bottom-up approaches and involvement of local institutions in the planning and implementation stages. The analysis also reveals a high dependence of these programmes on organizational, technical and financial support. Completely self-sustained CBBPs seem to be difficult to realize. There is a need to implement and document formal socio-economic evaluations of CBBPs to provide governments and other development agencies with the information necessary for creating sustainable CBBPs at larger scales.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Under hot conditions, contemporary commercial broilers do not reach their full genetic potential for growth rate, body weight (BW), or breast meat yield because dissipation of their excessively produced internal (metabolic) heat is hindered by the feathers. Therefore, it was hypothesized that heat stress can be alleviated by using the naked-neck gene (Na) or the featherless gene (sc). The study consisted of 4 experimental genetic groups (fully feathered, heterozygous naked neck, homozygous naked neck, featherless), progeny of the same double-heterozygous parents (Na/na +/sc), and commercial broilers. Birds from all 5 groups were brooded together until d 21 when one-half of the birds from each group were moved to hot conditions (constant 35 degrees C), and the others remained under comfortable conditions (constant 25 degrees C). Individual BW was recorded from hatch to slaughter at d 45 and 52 at 25 and 35 degrees C, respectively, when breast meat, rear part, heart, and spleen weights were recorded. Body temperature was recorded weekly from d 14 to 42. Feather coverage significantly affected the thermoregulatory capacity of the broilers under hot conditions. With reduced feather coverage (naked-neck), and more so without any feathers (featherless), the birds at 35 degrees C were able to minimize the elevation in body temperature. Consequently, only the featherless birds exhibited similar growth and BW under the 2 temperature treatments. The naked-neck birds at 35 degrees C showed only a marginal advantage over their fully feathered counterparts, indicating that 20 to 40% reduction in feather coverage provided only limited tolerance to the heat stress imposed by hot conditions. Breast meat yield of the featherless birds was much greater (3.5% of BW, approximately 25% advantage) than that of their partly feathered and fully feathered counterparts and the commercial birds under hot conditions. The high breast meat yield (at both 25 and 35 degrees C) of the featherless broilers suggests that the saved feather-building nutrients and greater oxygen-carrying capacity contribute to their greater breast meat yield. Because of these results, further research on genetically heat-tolerant broilers should focus on the featherless phenotype.