2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kijowski et al [18] found that a 3D FSE sequence had significantly higher sensitivity but significantly lower specificity for detecting 189 surgically confirmed cartilage lesions within the knee joint. In addition, studies performed by Kudo et al [21] and Milewski et al [16] showed similar diagnostic performance of 2D FSE and 3D FSE sequences for detecting smaller numbers of cartilage lesions in patients with arthroscopic correlation. Studies comparing 3D steadystate free-precession [15,19,22] and gradient recall-echo acquired in the steady-state [20] sequences with 2D FSE sequences have also shown similar sensitivities and specificities for detecting surgically confirmed car-tilage within the knee joint, indicating that performance issues are not unique to 3D FSE sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kijowski et al [18] found that a 3D FSE sequence had significantly higher sensitivity but significantly lower specificity for detecting 189 surgically confirmed cartilage lesions within the knee joint. In addition, studies performed by Kudo et al [21] and Milewski et al [16] showed similar diagnostic performance of 2D FSE and 3D FSE sequences for detecting smaller numbers of cartilage lesions in patients with arthroscopic correlation. Studies comparing 3D steadystate free-precession [15,19,22] and gradient recall-echo acquired in the steady-state [20] sequences with 2D FSE sequences have also shown similar sensitivities and specificities for detecting surgically confirmed car-tilage within the knee joint, indicating that performance issues are not unique to 3D FSE sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Despite the clear theoretic advantages, the use of 3D sequences has not translated into a substantial improvement in diagnostic performance for detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint in multiple clinical studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In most of these studies, the sensitivity for identifying cartilage lesions using both 2D FSE and 3D sequences is highest on the thick articular surface of the patella and lowest on the lateral tibial plateau, where the curved articular surface is prone to partial volume averaging and imaging artifacts.…”
Section: Gustas Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 In the knee, such images with 6-mm isotropic resolution have been shown to be similar to conventional 2D TSE sequences for characterization of meniscal tears, and superior to 2D techniques for the detection of flap tears. 57,58 Other results in the shoulder have been equally promising: In one study, 3D TSE sequences demonstrated near-perfect concordance with 2D TSE and decreased examination time by almost 40%. 59 Three-dimensional imaging techniques in combination with MR arthrography have also proven to be suitable substitutes for the evaluation of bony Bankart lesions and glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability.…”
Section: High-resolution Mrimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…T2 mapping, a sequence sensitive to T2 prolongation induced by cartilage degeneration, has been considered as effective in detecting very early patellar cartilage lesions although the technique is time consuming and has lower resolution (2,3,6,17). We currently use these two sequences in our daily practice for imaging of the patellar cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%