2019
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 3 Pediatric Pelvic Osteotomies for Acetabular Dysplasia Using Patient-specific 3D-printed Models

Abstract: Background: Children with developmental dysplasia of the hip may require a pelvic osteotomy to treat acetabular dysplasia. Three osteotomies are commonly performed in these patients (Pemberton, Dega, and San Diego), though comparative studies of each are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in acetabular morphology (acetabular version, volume, and octant coverage angles) created by these 3 osteotomies using matched patient-specific 3D-printed pelvic models. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,18 Since the orientation of the acetabulum is skewed posteriorly and superiorly, we predict that the San Diego pelvic osteotomy (modification of Dega procedure, which enables better posterior coverage), or triple pelvic osteotomy in older children, might be better methods for the proper redirection of the acetabulum walls. 18,19 Despite this, further investigation including prospective studies comparing different surgical techniques or experimental models should be performed, as has been done previously in DDH cases by Caffrey et al 20 In conclusion, this study clearly shows that the acetabulum in CFD is distorted globally, with its axis skewed mainly posteriorly and superiorly. The severity of the disease influences the size of the acetabulum, making it smaller.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…7,18 Since the orientation of the acetabulum is skewed posteriorly and superiorly, we predict that the San Diego pelvic osteotomy (modification of Dega procedure, which enables better posterior coverage), or triple pelvic osteotomy in older children, might be better methods for the proper redirection of the acetabulum walls. 18,19 Despite this, further investigation including prospective studies comparing different surgical techniques or experimental models should be performed, as has been done previously in DDH cases by Caffrey et al 20 In conclusion, this study clearly shows that the acetabulum in CFD is distorted globally, with its axis skewed mainly posteriorly and superiorly. The severity of the disease influences the size of the acetabulum, making it smaller.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…With the advent of surgical techniques to address the deficient acetabulum, this can have significant clinical consequences. Acetabuloplasties do not all increase coverage in the same areas and may worsen coverage in some areas [30]. Tannast et al [16], for example, described iatrogenic retroversion following pelvic osteotomies causing poor patient outcomes requiring revision pelvic osteotomies in typical DDH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using patient-specific 3D-printed models based on preoperative CT scans of 14 patients, Caffrey et al 32 performed mock surgeries, including Dega’s, San Diego as well as Pemberton osteotomies. The Pemberton osteotomy was found to have 5.47° ( sd 1.54°) of decreased version, albeit an increased coverage in the anterior acetabular region when compared with the preoperative status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%