1986
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198604000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between ultrasonic and thermodilution cardiac output measurements in intensive care patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported are generally good or excellent for measurements in the aorta, only slightly worse for those in the mitral valve area and somewhat worse for those in the pulmonary artery. For the present paper, data from 20 studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (special reference list) were considered, which comply with the following requirements: they compare various types of Doppler measurements with invasive results; they report absolute results for flow; and the measurements are made in the aorta. The correlations of Doppler v. invasive methods such as Fick, indicator dilution, electromagnetic flowmetry or volumetric measurements by beaker and stopwatch are summarized in figure 4.…”
Section: Review Of Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported are generally good or excellent for measurements in the aorta, only slightly worse for those in the mitral valve area and somewhat worse for those in the pulmonary artery. For the present paper, data from 20 studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (special reference list) were considered, which comply with the following requirements: they compare various types of Doppler measurements with invasive results; they report absolute results for flow; and the measurements are made in the aorta. The correlations of Doppler v. invasive methods such as Fick, indicator dilution, electromagnetic flowmetry or volumetric measurements by beaker and stopwatch are summarized in figure 4.…”
Section: Review Of Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%